Bourbaki

Proposition 15

Tag 03RL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03RL].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 5. Properties of integers

Let nn and hh be integers and let E be a set with hh elements. Then the number of mappings uu of E into [0,n][0, n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) \leqslant n (resp. ∑x∈Eu(x)=n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) = n, for h>0h > 0) is

(n+hh)(resp. (n+h−1h−1)).\binom{n+h}{h} \left( \text{resp.} \ \binom{n+h-1}{h-1} \right).

Let A(h,n)A(h, n) (resp. B(h,n)B(h, n)) denote the number of mappings uu of E into [0,n][0, n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) \leqslant n (resp. ∑x∈Eu(x)=n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) = n for h>0h > 0). We show first that A(h−1,n)=B(h,n)A(h-1, n) = B(h, n). For this, let E′ be a subset of E with h−1h - 1 elements, and let {a}=E−E′\{a\} = E - E'. If uu is a mapping of E into [0,n][0, n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)=n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) = n, then its restriction u′u' to E′ is such that ∑x∈E′u′(x)⩽n\sum_{x \in E'} u'(x) \leqslant n, and moreover u(a)=n−∑x∈E′u′(x)u(a) = n - \sum_{x \in E'} u'(x). Conversely, every mapping u′u' of E′ into [0,n][0, n] which satisfies ∑x∈E′u′(x)⩽n\sum_{x \in E'} u'(x) \leqslant n defines a unique mapping uu of E into [0,n][0, n], of which u′u' is the restriction, and which is such that ∑x∋Eu(x)=n\sum_{x \ni E} u(x) = n.

We note next that if ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) \leqslant n, then either ∑x∈Eu(x)=n\sum_{x \in E} u(x) = n, or else ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n−1\sum_{x \in E} u(x) \leqslant n-1, and these two possibilities are mutually exclusive. Consequently

A(h,n)=A(h,n−1)+B(h,n)=A(h,n−1)+A(h−1,n).A(h, n) = A(h, n-1) + B(h, n) = A(h, n-1) + A(h-1, n).

Since A(0,0)=1=(00)A(0, 0) = 1 = \binom{0}{0}, the formula A(h,n)=(n+hh)A(h, n) = \binom{n+h}{h} follows from above and from Proposition 13, by induction on n+hn + h.

\* The number of monomials X1α1X2α2…XhαnX_1^{\alpha_1} X_2^{\alpha_2} \ldots X_h^{\alpha_n} in hh indeterminates with total degree ⩽n\leqslant n is evidently equal to the number of mappings i→αii \rightarrow \alpha_i of [1,h][1, h] into [0,n][0, n] such that ∑i=0hαi⩽n\sum_{i=0}^{h} \alpha_i \leqslant n, and is therefore equal to (n+hh)\binom{n+h}{h} by Proposition 15; this number is also the number of monomials in h+1h + 1 indeterminates with total degree nn. \*

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.