Let n and h be integers and let E be a set with h elements. Then the number of mappings u of E into [0,n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n (resp. ∑x∈Eu(x)=n, for h>0) is
(hn+h)(resp. (h−1n+h−1)).
Let A(h,n) (resp. B(h,n)) denote the number of mappings u of E into [0,n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n (resp. ∑x∈Eu(x)=n for h>0). We show first that A(h−1,n)=B(h,n). For this, let E′ be a subset of E with h−1 elements, and let {a}=E−E′. If u is a mapping of E into [0,n] such that ∑x∈Eu(x)=n, then its restriction u′ to E′ is such that ∑x∈E′u′(x)⩽n, and moreover u(a)=n−∑x∈E′u′(x). Conversely, every mapping u′ of E′ into [0,n] which satisfies ∑x∈E′u′(x)⩽n defines a unique mapping u of E into [0,n], of which u′ is the restriction, and which is such that ∑x∋Eu(x)=n.
We note next that if ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n, then either ∑x∈Eu(x)=n, or else ∑x∈Eu(x)⩽n−1, and these two possibilities are mutually exclusive. Consequently
A(h,n)=A(h,n−1)+B(h,n)=A(h,n−1)+A(h−1,n).
Since A(0,0)=1=(00), the formula A(h,n)=(hn+h) follows from above and from Proposition 13, by induction on n+h.
\* The number of monomials X1α1X2α2…Xhαn in h indeterminates with total degree ⩽n is evidently equal to the number of mappings i→αi of [1,h] into [0,n] such that ∑i=0hαi⩽n, and is therefore equal to (hn+h) by Proposition 15; this number is also the number of monomials in h+1 indeterminates with total degree n. \*
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.