Let(Eα,fβα)and(Eα′,fβα′)be two direct systems of sets, both relative to the same directed set I. LetE=limEα, E′=limEα′, and letfα:Eα→E,fα′:Eα′→E′denote the canonical mappings, for eachα∈I. Then(Eα×Eα′,fβα×fβα′)is a direct systems of sets,(fα×fα′)is a direct system of mappings, andlim(fα×fα′)is a bijection
(34)
lim(Eα×Eα′)→(limEα)×(limEα′).
The first two assertions of the Proposition are immediately verified. To show that g=lim(fα×fα′) is bijective, we apply Proposition 6 of no. 6. Clearly E×E′ is the union of the sets fα(Eα)×fα′(Eα′); hence g is surjective. If (x,x′) and (y,y′) are two elements of Eα×Eα′ such that fα(x)=fα(y) and fα′(x′)=fα′(y′), then (no. 5, Lemma 1) there exist two elements β, γ of I such that β⩾α, γ⩾α, and fβα(x)=fβα(y), fγα′(x′)=fγα′(y′); since I is directed, there exists δ∈I such that δ⩾β and δ⩾γ; hence fδα(x)=fδα(y) and fδα′(x′)=fδα′(y′). This completes the proof.
The bijection g is called canonical.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.