Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 03VD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03VD].

Theory of Sets, chapter IV, § 1. Structures and isomorphisms

By abuse of language, if fif_i is any bijection of Ei\mathrm{E}_i onto Ei′\mathrm{E}'_i (1⩽i⩽n)(1 \leqslant i \leqslant n), (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n) is said to be an isomorphism of E1,…,En\mathrm{E}_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}_n onto E1′,…,En′\mathrm{E}'_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}'_n with respect to the species of structure of a set (no. 4, Remark 3).

CST5. In a theory T′\mathscr{T}' which is stronger than T\mathscr{T}, let U be a structure of species Σ\Sigma on E1,…,En\mathrm{E}_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}_n, and let fif_i be a bijection of Ei\mathrm{E}_i onto a set Ei′\mathrm{E}'_i (1⩽i⩽n)(1 \leqslant i \leqslant n). Then there exists a unique structure of species Σ\Sigma on E1′,…,En′\mathrm{E}'_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}'_n such that (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n) is an isomorphism of E1,…,En\mathrm{E}_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}_n onto E1′,…,En′\mathrm{E}'_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}'_n.

For this structure, if it exists, can only be the term U′\mathrm{U}' defined by the relation (4); it remains to be verified that this term is indeed a structure of species Σ\Sigma, i.e., that the relation R{E1′,…,En′,U′}\mathrm{R}\{\mathrm{E}'_1, \ldots, \mathrm{E}'_n, \mathrm{U}'\} is true in T′\mathscr{T}'. But this follows from the fact that R{x1,…,xn,s}\mathrm{R}\{x_1, \ldots, x_n, s\} is transportable, for

R{E1′,…,En′,U′}R\{E'_1, \ldots, E'_n, U'\} is equivalent in T′\mathscr{T}' to the relation R{E1,…,En,U}R\{E_1, \ldots, E_n, U\} (no. 3), which is true in T′\mathscr{T}' by hypothesis.

¶ The structure U′U' is said to be obtained by transporting the structure UU to the sets E1′,…,En′E'_1, \ldots, E'_n by means of the bijective mappings f1,…,fnf_1, \ldots, f_n. Thus two structures of the same species are isomorphic if and only if each is obtained from the other by transport of structure.

It may happen that any two structures of species Σ\Sigma are necessarily isomorphic; the species of structure Σ\Sigma is then said be univalent. \* This is the case for the structure of an infinite cyclic group (isomorphic to Z\mathbf{Z}), the structure of a prime field of characteristic zero (isomorphic to Q\mathbf{Q}), the structure of a complete Archimedean ordered field (isomorphic to R\mathbf{R}), the structure of an algebraically closed, connected, locally compact topological field (isomorphic to C\mathbf{C}), and of the structure of a non-commutative, connected, locally compact topological division ring (isomorphic to H\mathbf{H}, the division ring of quaternions). For some of these species of structure, for example that of a prime field of characteristic zero, or that of a complete Archimedean ordered field, there is not even any automorphism other than the identity mapping; but there do exist such automorphisms for the other examples given above (for example, the symmetry x→−xx \rightarrow -x in Z\mathbf{Z}). \*

It will be observed that the above species of structure are essentially those which are the basis of classical mathematics. On the other hand, \* the species of group structures, the species of structures of an ordered set, and the species of topological structures, are not univalent. \*

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.