Remark
Tag 03VD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03VD].
Theory of Sets, chapter IV, § 1. Structures and isomorphisms
By abuse of language, if is any bijection of onto , is said to be an isomorphism of onto with respect to the species of structure of a set (no. 4, Remark 3).
CST5. In a theory which is stronger than , let U be a structure of species on , and let be a bijection of onto a set . Then there exists a unique structure of species on such that is an isomorphism of onto .
For this structure, if it exists, can only be the term defined by the relation (4); it remains to be verified that this term is indeed a structure of species , i.e., that the relation is true in . But this follows from the fact that is transportable, for
is equivalent in to the relation (no. 3), which is true in by hypothesis.
¶ The structure is said to be obtained by transporting the structure to the sets by means of the bijective mappings . Thus two structures of the same species are isomorphic if and only if each is obtained from the other by transport of structure.
It may happen that any two structures of species are necessarily isomorphic; the species of structure is then said be univalent. \* This is the case for the structure of an infinite cyclic group (isomorphic to ), the structure of a prime field of characteristic zero (isomorphic to ), the structure of a complete Archimedean ordered field (isomorphic to ), the structure of an algebraically closed, connected, locally compact topological field (isomorphic to ), and of the structure of a non-commutative, connected, locally compact topological division ring (isomorphic to , the division ring of quaternions). For some of these species of structure, for example that of a prime field of characteristic zero, or that of a complete Archimedean ordered field, there is not even any automorphism other than the identity mapping; but there do exist such automorphisms for the other examples given above (for example, the symmetry in ). \*
It will be observed that the above species of structure are essentially those which are the basis of classical mathematics. On the other hand, \* the species of group structures, the species of structures of an ordered set, and the species of topological structures, are not univalent. \*
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.