Consider a commutative diagram of commutative groups:
Aa↓A′uu′Bb↓B′vv′Cc↓C′
Suppose that the two rows of (10) are exact. Then:
(i) If c is injective, we have
(11) Im(b)∩Im(u′)=Im(u′∘a)=Im(b∘u).
(ii) If a is surjective, we have
(12) Ker(b)+Im(u)=Ker(v′∘b)=Ker(c∘v).
Let us prove (i). Clearly
Im(u′∘a)=Im(b∘u)⊂Im(b)∩Im(u′).
Conversely, let x∈Im(b)∩Im(u′). There exists y∈B such that x=b(y). As v′∘u′=0, we have 0=v′(x)=v′(b(y))=c(v(y)), whence v(y)=0 since c is injective. As (u,v) is an exact sequence, there exists z∈A such that y=u(z), whence x=b(u(z)).
Let us prove (ii). As v∘u=0 and v′∘u′=0, it is clear that
Ker(b)+Im(u)⊂Ker(v′∘b)=Ker(c∘v).
Conversely, let x∈Ker(v′∘b). Then b(x)∈Ker(v′) and there exists y′∈A′ such that u′(y′)=b(x), since the sequence (u′,v′) is exact. As a is surjective, there exists y∈A such that a(y)=y′, whence b(x)=u′(a(y))=b(u(y)); it follows that x−u(y)∈Ker(b), which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.