Definition 2
Tag 045M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 045M].
Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions
Let be a ring, a subset of and the multiplicative subset generated by . The ring of fractions of defined by and denoted by is the quotient set of under the equivalence relation (1) with the ring structure defined by
for in , in . The canonical mapping of to is the homomorphism , which makes into an -algebra.
In this chapter we usually denote this canonical mapping by ; the proof of Proposition 1 shows that the ordered pair satisfies the conditions of the statement of this proposition.
Remarks
(1) Clearly .
(2) Two elements of can always be written in the form and ( in , ) with the same "denominator" , for if and are two elements of , then and .
(3) The kernel of is the set of such that there exists satisfying ; for to be injective, it is necessary and sufficient that contain no divisor of zero in .
(4) If contains a nilpotent element, then and the ring is reduced to 0; this follows easily from Definition 2.
(5) For to be a bijection, it is necessary and sufficient that every element be invertible in : the condition is obviously necessary, since is invertible in ; it is sufficient, since for all , is therefore invertible in and in ; hence is surjective and it has already been seen in Remark 3 that it is injective. Then and are identified by means of .
Example (7). If is the set of elements in which are not divisors of 0, the ring is precisely what we have called the ring of fractions of (Algebra, Chapter I, §9, no. 4); to avoid any confusion we shall often call it the total ring of fractions of . In particular, if is an integral domain, is the field of fractions of (loc. cit.).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.