Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 045Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 045Z].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions

Let A, B be two rings, S a multiplicative subset of A, T a multiplicative subset of B and f a homomorphism from A to B such that f(S)⊂Tf(S) \subset T. Let M be an A-module, N a B-module and u an A-linear mapping from M to N. Then there exists a unique S−1AS^{-1}A-linear mapping u′u' from S−1MS^{-1}M to T−1NT^{-1}N such that u′(m/1)=u(m)/1u'(m/1) = u(m)/1 for all m∈Mm \in M.

The mapping iNT∘ui_N^T \circ u from M to T−1NT^{-1}N is A-linear. Moreover, if s∈Ss \in S, then f(s)∈Tf(s) \in T, hence the homothety induced by s on T−1NT^{-1}N is bijective. The existence and uniqueness of u′u' then follow from Proposition 3. Then, for m∈Mm \in M and s∈Ss \in S,

u′(m/s)=u(m)/f(s). u'(m/s) = u(m)/f(s).

With the Same notation, let C be a third ring, U a multiplicative subset of C, g a homomorphism from B to C such that g(T)⊂Ug(T) \subset U, P a C-module, v a B-linear mapping from N to P and v′v' the T−1BT^{-1}B-linear mapping from B to U−1PU^{-1}P associated with v. Then

(v∘u)′=v′∘u′ (v \circ u)' = v' \circ u'

where the left hand side is the A-linear mapping S−1M→U−1PS^{-1}M \to U^{-1}P associated with v∘uv \circ u. Similarly, if u1u_1 is a second A-linear mapping from M to N, then

(u+u1)′=u′+u; (u + u_1)' = u' + u_;

the left-hand side being the A-linear mapping S−1M→T−1NS^{-1}M \to T^{-1}N associated with u+u1u + u_1.

Remark (5). If, in Proposition 5, we take B=A,T=SB = A, T = S and f=1Af = 1_A, it is easily seen that u′u' is just the mapping u⊗1:M⊗S−1A→N⊗S−1Au \otimes 1 : M \otimes S^{-1}A \to N \otimes S^{-1}A. We shall henceforth denote it by S−1uS^{-1}u; if S is the complement of a prime ideal pp of A, we write upu_p instead of S−1uS^{-1}u.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.