Proposition 5
Tag 045Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 045Z].
Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions
Let A, B be two rings, S a multiplicative subset of A, T a multiplicative subset of B and f a homomorphism from A to B such that . Let M be an A-module, N a B-module and u an A-linear mapping from M to N. Then there exists a unique -linear mapping from to such that for all .
The mapping from M to is A-linear. Moreover, if , then , hence the homothety induced by s on is bijective. The existence and uniqueness of then follow from Proposition 3. Then, for and ,
With the Same notation, let C be a third ring, U a multiplicative subset of C, g a homomorphism from B to C such that , P a C-module, v a B-linear mapping from N to P and the -linear mapping from B to associated with v. Then
where the left hand side is the A-linear mapping associated with . Similarly, if is a second A-linear mapping from M to N, then
the left-hand side being the A-linear mapping associated with .
Remark (5). If, in Proposition 5, we take and , it is easily seen that is just the mapping . We shall henceforth denote it by ; if S is the complement of a prime ideal of A, we write instead of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.