Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 0466, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0466].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions

Let MM be an AA-module. For every submodule N′N' of the S−1AS^{-1}A-module S−1MS^{-1}M, let ϕ(N′)\phi(N') be the inverse image of N′N' under iMSi_M^S. Then: (i) Sϕ(N′)=N′S\phi(N') = N'.

(ii) For every submodule NN of MM, the submodule ϕ(S−1N)\phi(S^{-1}N) of MM consists of those m∈Mm \in M for which there exists s∈Ss \in S such that sm∈Nsm \in N.

(iii) ϕ\phi is an isomorphism (for the orderings defined by inclusion) of the set of sub- S−1AS^{-1}A-modules of S−1MS^{-1}M onto the set of submodules QQ of MM which satisfy the following condition:

(MS) If sm∈Qsm \in Q, where s∈Ss \in S, m∈Mm \in M, then m∈Qm \in Q.

Obviously S−1ϕ(N′)⊂N′S^{-1}\phi(N') \subset N'; conversely, if n′=m/s∈N′n' = m/s \in N', then m/1∈N′m/1 \in N', hence m∈ϕ(N′)m \in \phi(N') and consequently n′∈S−1(ϕ(N′))n' \in S^{-1}(\phi(N')); whence (i). For an element m∈Mm \in M to be such that m∈ϕ(S−1N)m \in \phi(S^{-1}N), it is necessary and sufficient that m/1∈S−1Nm/1 \in S^{-1}N, that is that there exist s∈Ss \in S and n∈Nn \in N such that m/1=n/sm/1 = n/s; this means that there exists s′∈Ss' \in S such that s′sm=sn∈Ns'sm = sn \in N, whence (ii). Finally, the relation sm∈ϕ(N′)sm \in \phi(N') is equivalent by definition to sm/1∈N′sm/1 \in N' and as s/1s/1 is invertible in S−1AS^{-1}A, this implies m/1∈N′m/1 \in N', or m∈ϕ(N′)m \in \phi(N'), hence ϕ(N′)\phi(N') satisfies condition (MS); on the other hand, it follows from (ii) that, if NN satisfies (MS), then ϕ(S−1N)=N\phi(S^{-1}N) = N, which completes the proof of (iii).

The submodule ϕ(S−1N)\phi(S^{-1}N) is called the saturation of NN in MM with respect to SS, and the submodules satisfying condition (MS) (and hence equal to their saturations) are said to be saturated with respect to SS. The submodule ϕ(S−1N)\phi(S^{-1}N) is the kernel of the composite homomorphism

M→hM/N→iM/NSS−1M/S−1N M \xrightarrow{h} M/N \xrightarrow{i_{M/N}^{S}} S^{-1}M/S^{-1}N

where hh is the canonical homomorphism, as follows from the commutativity of the diagram

M→hM/NiMS↓iM/NS↓S−1M→s−1hS−1M/S−1N \begin{array}{ccc} M & \xrightarrow{h} & M/N \\ i_M^S \downarrow & & i_{M/N}^S \downarrow \\ S^{-1}M & \xrightarrow{s^{-1}h} & S^{-1}M/S^{-1}N \end{array}

If SS is the complement in AA of a prime ideal pp, ϕ(S−1N)\phi(S^{-1}N) is also called the saturation of NN in MM with respect to pp.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.