Proposition 10
Tag 0466, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0466].
Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions
Let be an -module. For every submodule of the -module , let be the inverse image of under . Then: (i) .
(ii) For every submodule of , the submodule of consists of those for which there exists such that .
(iii) is an isomorphism (for the orderings defined by inclusion) of the set of sub- -modules of onto the set of submodules of which satisfy the following condition:
(MS) If , where , , then .
Obviously ; conversely, if , then , hence and consequently ; whence (i). For an element to be such that , it is necessary and sufficient that , that is that there exist and such that ; this means that there exists such that , whence (ii). Finally, the relation is equivalent by definition to and as is invertible in , this implies , or , hence satisfies condition (MS); on the other hand, it follows from (ii) that, if satisfies (MS), then , which completes the proof of (iii).
The submodule is called the saturation of in with respect to , and the submodules satisfying condition (MS) (and hence equal to their saturations) are said to be saturated with respect to . The submodule is the kernel of the composite homomorphism
where is the canonical homomorphism, as follows from the commutativity of the diagram
If is the complement in of a prime ideal , is also called the saturation of in with respect to .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.