Proposition 3
Tag 04KN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04KN].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IV, § 2. Primary decomposition
Let A be a Noetherian ring, S a multiplicative subset of A, p a prime ideal of A, M an A-module, N a submodule of M and the canonical mapping of M to .
(i) Suppose that . If N is p-primary with respect to M, then .
(ii) Suppose that . For N to be p-primary with respect to M, it is necessary and sufficient that N be of the form , where is a sub--module of which is -primary with respect to ; then .
(i) If and N is p-primary with respect to M, then
(§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5) and hence (§ 1, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2), whence .
(ii) Suppose that . If N is p-primary with respect to M, then (§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5) and hence the submodule of is -primary; moreover, if and are such that , then , for the homothety with ratio s in M/N is injective, whence (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, Proposition 10). Conversely, let be a submodule of which is -primary with respect to ; let us write ; then (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, Proposition 10) and . As the canonical mapping is injective, no prime ideal of A associated with M/N meets S (§ 1, no. 2, Proposition 6); it follows that (§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5), so that N is p-primary with respect to M.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.