Let A be a Noetherian ring, M an A-module, N a submodule of M and I=Ass(M/N). Let S be a multiplicative subset of A and J the subset of I consisting of the indices i such that S∩pi=∅. Let N′ be the saturation of N with respect to S in M. Then:
(i) If (Qi)i∈I is an element of DI(M/N), the family (Qi)i∈J is an element of DJ(M/N′) and the family (S−1Qi)i∈J is an element of DJ(S−1M/S−1N).
(ii) The mapping (Qi)i∈J→(S−1Qi)i∈J is a bijection of DJ(M/N′) onto DJ(S−1M/S−1N).
(iii) If (Qi)i∈J is an element of DJ(M/N′) and (Ri)i∈I an element of DI(M/N), the family (Ti)i∈I such that Ti=Qi for i∈J and Ti=Ri for i∈I−J is an element of DI(M/N).
(i) We know (no. 1, Proposition 3) that for i∈J,S−1Qi is primary for S−1pi and that for i∈I−J,S−1Qi=S−1M; as S−1N=⋂S−1Qi (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4), then also S−1N=⋂i∈JS−1Qi. The S−1pi for i∈J are distinct and their set is Ass(S−1M/S−1N) (§1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5); then (Proposition 4) (S−1Qi)i∈J is a reduced primary decomposition of S−1N. Moreover, Qi=(iMS)−1(S−1Qi) (no. 1 Proposition 3), hence N′=(iMS)−1(S−1N)=⋂i∈JQi and (Qi)i∈J is obviously a reduced primary decomposition of N′ in M.
(ii) As S−1N′=S−1N, we may replace N by N′, that is suppose that J=I. Let (Pi)i∈I be a reduced primary decomposition of S−1N in S−1M and let us write Qi=(iMS)−1(Pi); it follows from no. 1, Proposition 3 that Qi is primary for pi (i∈I) and (Qi)i∈I is then a reduced primary decomposition of N in M by virtue of no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4. Finally, as, for all i∈I and every submodule Qi′ of which M is pi-primary with respect to M,Qi′=(iMS)−1(S−1Qi′) by virtue of no. 1, Proposition 3 and the hypothesis J=I, we see that two mappings DI(M/N)→DI(S−1M/S−1N) and DI(S−1M/S−1N)→DI(M/N) have been defined whose compositions are the identities on DI(M/N) and DI(S−1M/S−1N), which proves (ii).
(iii) By virtue of (i), N′=⋂i∈JRi, whence
N=N′∩i∈I−J⋂Ri=(i∈J⋂Qi)∩(i∈I−J⋂Ri)
and it follows immediately from no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4 that this primary decomposition is reduced.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.