Proposition 8
Tag 04L2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04L2].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IV, § 2. Primary decomposition
Let be a module of finite length over a Noetherian ring .
(i) There only exists a single primary decomposition of with respect to indexed by (necessarily reduced) — let be this decomposition, where is -primary with respect to .
(ii) There exists an integer such that, for all and all , .
(iii) For all , the canonical mapping of to is surjective and its kernel is .
(iv) The canonical injection of into is bijective.
As every element is minimal in (Proposition 7), assertion (i) follows from no. 3, Proposition 5. As is finitely generated, there exists such that for all and all (no. 1, Remark); but as is a maximal ideal, is -primary with respect to (no. 1, Examples 2 and 3) and, as , it follows from (i) that necessarily for all ; whence (ii). As the , for , are relatively prime in pairs (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 2, Proposition 3), the canonical mapping is surjective (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 2, Proposition 6), whence (iv). Then and (no. 3, Proposition 4); as the elements of are maximal ideals, is the only element of which does not meet ; is therefore the kernel of the canonical mapping (, no. 2, Proposition 6). If , the homothety of with ratio is injective by virtue of the relation (no. 1, Proposition 1); since is Artinian, this homothety is bijective (Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 1, no. 2, Lemma 3). The canonical mapping is then written , where is an -homomorphism (Chapter II, § 2, no. 2, Proposition 3); as , is injective; we conclude that is surjective and bijective.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.