Lemma 3
Tag 000I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 000I].
Algebra, VIII, p. 6, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules
Let A be a ring and a natural number. An Artinian A-module M that is the sum of a family of submodules of length has finite length.
We use induction on . First, suppose . If M were not of finite length, then we could construct a sequence of submodules of M of length 1 with for every . We would then have for every , and the sum of the family would be direct. However, this contradicts the fact that the A-module M is Artinian (VIII, p. 2, Example 2).
Now, suppose . Let be a family of submodules of M of length with sum M. For every , choose a submodule of of length such that has length . Set , and denote the image of in by . The modules are of length , and their sum is . The modules and are Artinian (VIII, p. 3, Proposition 3); by the induction hypothesis, they are of finite length. Hence, M has finite length (II, §1, No. 10, p. 212, Proposition 16).
Let us now prove Theorem 1. Let denote the set of left ideals of A such that the module has finite length. Let be a finite family of elements of . By Proposition 1 of VIII, p. 2, the A-module is Artinian and Noetherian for every . Consequently, is Artinian and Noetherian (VIII, p. 4, Corollary of Proposition 3), hence of finite length (VIII, p. 2, Proposition 1). This proves that is a left directed set for the inclusion. Since the ring A is left Artinian, the set has a least element . We denote the length of the A-module by .
Let be an element of and its annihilator (II, §1, No. 12, p. 219). The A-module is isomorphic to . If has finite length, then belongs to , so contains and has length . Thus, every monogenous left ideal of A of finite length has length . Let be the sum of these ideals; this is a left ideal of A, of finite length by Lemma 3. Every left ideal of A of finite length is a sum of monogenous left ideals of finite length and is therefore contained in . Hence, is the largest left ideal of A of finite length.
If were distinct from A, then the set of left ideals of A containing and distinct from would have a minimal element . The A-module would then have length 1, and would have finite length, which contradicts the fact that is maximal. We therefore have ; the A-module has finite length.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- ac-iv-s2-prop-8 not in this corpus
- Proposition 4, § 1
Cites
- II, §1, No. 12, p. 219
- II, §1, No. 10, p. 212, Proposition 16 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 4, Corollary of Proposition 3
- VIII, p. 2, Example 2
- Proposition 1 of VIII, p. 2
- VIII, p. 2, Proposition 1
- VIII, p. 3, Proposition 3
- Theorem 1