Proposition 3
Tag 0009, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0009].
Algebra, VIII, p. 3, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules
Let M be an A-module and N a submodule of M. Then M is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if and only if N and are.
We will give the proof in the case of Artinian modules; the case of Noetherian modules is analogous.
Suppose that M is Artinian. Since every submodule of N is a submodule of M, the module N is Artinian. Let be a decreasing sequence of submodules of . There exists a decreasing sequence of submodules of M containing N such that for every (I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4). Since M is Artinian, the sequence is stationary, hence so is the sequence . Consequently, the module is Artinian.
Conversely, suppose that the modules N and are Artinian, and consider a decreasing sequence of submodules of M. The sequence of submodules of N is stationary. Likewise, the sequence of submodules of is stationary. Hence, there exists an integer such that we have and for every integer . The sequence is then stationary by the following lemma.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4 not in this corpus