Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0009, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0009].

Algebra, VIII, p. 3, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules

Let M be an A-module and N a submodule of M. Then M is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if and only if N and M/NM/N are.

We will give the proof in the case of Artinian modules; the case of Noetherian modules is analogous.

Suppose that M is Artinian. Since every submodule of N is a submodule of M, the module N is Artinian. Let (Pn)n∈N(P_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} be a decreasing sequence of submodules of M/NM/N. There exists a decreasing sequence (Qn)n∈N(Q_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} of submodules of M containing N such that Pn=Qn/NP_n= Q_n/N for every n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N} (I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4). Since M is Artinian, the sequence (Qn)(Q_n) is stationary, hence so is the sequence (Pn)(P_n). Consequently, the module M/NM/N is Artinian.

Conversely, suppose that the modules N and M/NM/N are Artinian, and consider a decreasing sequence (Pn)(P_n) of submodules of M. The sequence Pn′=N∩PnP'_n= N\cap P_n of submodules of N is stationary. Likewise, the sequence Pn′′=(N+Pn)/NP''_n= (N + P_n)/N of submodules of M/NM/N is stationary. Hence, there exists an integer m∈Nm\in \mathbf{N} such that we have Pn′=Pm′P'_n= P'_m and Pn′′=Pm′′P''_n= P''_m for every integer n⩾mn\geqslant m. The sequence (Pn)(P_n) is then stationary by the following lemma.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • I, §4, No. 6, p. 41, Theorem 4 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.