Proposition 10
Tag 04LC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04LC].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IV, § 2. Primary decomposition
Let be a Noetherian ring and the prime ideals associated with the A-module , where for .
(i) The set is the set of elements which are not divisors of 0 in .
(ii) If all the are minimal elements of , the total ring of fractions of is Artinian.
(iii) If the ring is reduced, all the are minimal elements of (and therefore are the minimal elements of ) and each of the is a field; for each index , the canonical homomorphism (Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) is surjective and its kernel is ; finally the canonical homomorphism from to is bijective.
The fact that is the set of elements which are not divisors of 0 in has already been seen (§ 1, no. 1, Corollary 3 to Proposition 2). The prime ideals of are of the form , where is a prime ideal of contained in (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 5, Proposition 10) that is contained in one of the (Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2). If is a minimal element of , it is a minimal element of (§ 1, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 7); if each of the is a minimal element of , we then see that the prime ideals of are the and they are therefore all maximal, which proves that is Artinian (Proposition 9).
Suppose finally that the ring is reduced. Then (§ 1, no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 7). We deduce that is a reduced primary decomposition of the ideal (no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4); in particular, none of the can contain a of index and therefore the are all minimal elements of . The ring is then Artinian by (ii). The are prime ideals associated with the -module (§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5) and (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4); as the are distinct, is a reduced primary decomposition of in (no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4). Proposition 8 then shows that the canonical homomorphismg,: is surjective and has kernel and the canonical homomorphism is bijective. We know moreover that the canonical homomorphism , is composed of g, and an isomorphism , (Chapter II, § 2, no. 3, Proposition 7). Finally, it follows from Proposition 8 that is isomorphic to and hence is a field since is a maximal ideal.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2
- Chapter II, § 2, no. 4
- Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2
- Chapter II, § 2, no. 3, Proposition 7
- § 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5
- § 1, no. 1, Corollary 3 to Proposition 2
- § 1, no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 7
- Corollary to Proposition 4
- Proposition 8
- Proposition 9