Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 04LC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04LC].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IV, § 2. Primary decomposition

Let AA be a Noetherian ring and p1,…,pnp_1, \ldots, p_n the prime ideals associated with the A-module AA, where pi≠pjp_i \neq p_j for i≠ji \neq j.

(i) The set S=⋂i=1n(A−pi)S = \bigcap_{i=1}^n (A - p_i) is the set of elements which are not divisors of 0 in AA.

(ii) If all the pip_i are minimal elements of Ass⁡(A)\operatorname{Ass}(A), the total ring of fractions S−1AS^{-1}A of AA is Artinian.

(iii) If the ring AA is reduced, all the pip_i are minimal elements of Ass⁡(A)\operatorname{Ass}(A) (and therefore are the minimal elements of Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A)) and each of the ApiA_{p_i} is a field; for each index ii, the canonical homomorphism S−1A→ApiS^{-1}A \to A_{p_i} (Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2) is surjective and its kernel is S−1piS^{-1}p_i; finally the canonical homomorphism from S−1AS^{-1}A to ∏i=1n(S−1A/S−1pi)\prod_{i=1}^n (S^{-1}A/S^{-1}p_i) is bijective.

The fact that SS is the set of elements which are not divisors of 0 in A\mathbf{A} has already been seen (§ 1, no. 1, Corollary 3 to Proposition 2). The prime ideals of S−1AS^{-1}A are of the form S−1pS^{-1}p, where pp is a prime ideal of AA contained in ⋃i=1npi\bigcup_{i=1}^n p_i (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 5, Proposition 10) that is contained in one of the pip_i (Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2). If pip_i is a minimal element of Ass⁡(A)\operatorname{Ass}(A), it is a minimal element of Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A) (§ 1, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 7); if each of the pip_i is a minimal element of Ass⁡(A)\operatorname{Ass}(A), we then see that the prime ideals of S−1AS^{-1}A are the S−1piS^{-1}p_i and they are therefore all maximal, which proves that S−1AS^{-1}A is Artinian (Proposition 9).

Suppose finally that the ring AA is reduced. Then ⋂i=1npi={0}\bigcap_{i=1}^n p_i = \{0\} (§ 1, no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 7). We deduce that {0}=⋂i=1npi\{0\} = \bigcap_{i=1}^n p_i is a reduced primary decomposition of the ideal {0}\{0\} (no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4); in particular, none of the pip_i can contain a pjp_j of index j≠ij \neq i and therefore the pip_i are all minimal elements of Ass⁡(A)\operatorname{Ass}(A). The ring S−1AS^{-1}A is then Artinian by (ii). The S−1piS^{-1}p_i are prime ideals associated with the S−1AS^{-1}A-module S−1AS^{-1}A (§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Proposition 5) and {0}=S−1(⋂i=1npi)=⋂i=1nS−1pi\{0\} = S^{-1} \left( \bigcap_{i=1}^n p_i \right) = \bigcap_{i=1}^n S^{-1}p_i (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4); as the S−1piS^{-1}p_i are distinct, (S−1pi)1≤i≤n(S^{-1}p_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is a reduced primary decomposition of {0}\{0\} in S−1AS^{-1}A (no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 4). Proposition 8 then shows that the canonical homomorphismg,: S−1A→(S−1A)piS^{-1}A \to (S^{-1}A)_{p_i} is surjective and has kernel S−1piS^{-1}p_i and the canonical homomorphism S−1A→∏i=1n(S−1A/S−1pi)S^{-1}A \to \prod_{i=1}^n (S^{-1}A/S^{-1}p_i) is bijective. We know moreover that the canonical homomorphism S−1A→AS^{-1}A \to A, is composed of g, and an isomorphism (S−1A)S−1pi→A(S^{-1}A)_{S^{-1}p_i} \to A, (Chapter II, § 2, no. 3, Proposition 7). Finally, it follows from Proposition 8 that (S−1A)S−1pi(S^{-1}A)_{S^{-1}p_i} is isomorphic to S−1A/S−1piS^{-1}A/S^{-1}p_i and hence is a field since S−1piS^{-1}p_i is a maximal ideal.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.