If e,f are two idempotents of A such that Ae and Af have the same radical then e=f.
There exists by hypothesis integers m≥0,n≥0 such that e=em∈Af and f=fn∈Ae; let x,y be elements of A such that e=xf,f=ye; then ef=x2=x=e and similarly ef=ye2=ye=f, whence e=f.
Lemma 2 and Corollary 2 to Proposition 11 show that the mappings ω and σ are injective.
Let us show that σ is surjective. If (ai)i∈I is an element of S, there are elements ei∈ai such that 1=∑i∈Iei; if i=j, then eiej∈ai∩aj={0}, whence
ei=j∈I∑eiej=ei2;
finally, Aei⊂ai, for all i∈I and ∑i∈IAei=A, whence Aei=ai.
It remains to prove that ω is surjective. Let (Ui)i∈I be an element of P and set Zi=⋃j=iUj; as Ui and Zi are closed, there exist ideals ai,bi of A such that Ui=V(ai),Zi=V(bi). We now show that it is possible to suppose further that ai∩bi=0. Now Ui∩Zi=∅, whence ai+bi=A; let ai,bi∈ai,bi be such that ai+bi=1. Then X=Ui∪Zi=V(aibi) (formula (3)); every element of aibi is therefore nilpotent (Corollary 2 to Proposition 11); let p be an integer such that aipbip=0. Then Ui⊂V(Aai)=V(Aaip),
Zi⊂V(Abi)=V(Abip)
and V(Aai)∩V(Abi)=V(Aai+Abi)=∅, hence Ui=V(Aaip) and Zi=V(Abip), which establishes our assertion by replacing ai by Aaip and bi by Abip. The ideals ai and bi thus chosen, it follows from the fact that σ is bijective that there exist two idempotents fi∈ai,ei∈bi such that 1=ei+fi,eifi=0,ai=Afi,bi=Aei. If i=j, then X=Z,∪Zj=V(Aeiej), and as eiej is idempotent, Lemma 2 shows that eiej=0. Finally e=∑i∈Iei is idempotent and ei∈Ae for all i∈I, whence V(Ae)⊂Z, for all i; it follows that
V(Ae)=∅=V(A.1)
and Lemma 2 shows also that e=1.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.