Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 04A6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04A6].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 4. Spectra of rings and supports of modules

If e,fe, f are two idempotents of AA such that AeAe and AfAf have the same radical then e=fe = f.

There exists by hypothesis integers m≥0,n≥0m \geq 0, n \geq 0 such that e=em∈Afe = e^m \in Af and f=fn∈Aef = f^n \in Ae; let x,yx, y be elements of AA such that e=xf,f=yee = xf, f = ye; then ef=x2=x=eef = x^2 = x = e and similarly ef=ye2=ye=fef = ye^2 = ye = f, whence e=fe = f.

Lemma 2 and Corollary 2 to Proposition 11 show that the mappings ω‾\overline{\omega} and σ\sigma are injective.

Let us show that σ\sigma is surjective. If (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} is an element of SS, there are elements ei∈aie_i \in a_i such that 1=∑i∈Iei1 = \sum_{i \in I} e_i; if i≠ji \neq j, then eiej∈ai∩aj={0}e_i e_j \in a_i \cap a_j = \{0\}, whence

ei=∑j∈Ieiej=ei2; e_i = \sum_{j \in I} e_i e_j = e_i^2;

finally, Aei⊂aiAe_i \subset a_i, for all i∈Ii \in I and ∑i∈IAei=A\sum_{i \in I} Ae_i = A, whence Aei=aiAe_i = a_i.

It remains to prove that ω‾\overline{\omega} is surjective. Let (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i \in I} be an element of PP and set Zi=⋃j≠iUjZ_i = \bigcup_{j \neq i} U_j; as UiU_i and ZiZ_i are closed, there exist ideals ai,bia_i, b_i of AA such that Ui=V(ai),Zi=V(bi)U_i = \mathrm{V}(a_i), Z_i = \mathrm{V}(b_i). We now show that it is possible to suppose further that ai∩bi=0a_i \cap b_i = 0. Now Ui∩Zi=∅U_i \cap Z_i = \varnothing, whence ai+bi=Aa_i + b_i = A; let ai,bi∈ai,bia_i, b_i \in a_i, b_i be such that ai+bi=1a_i + b_i = 1. Then X=Ui∪Zi=V(aibi)X = U_i \cup Z_i = \mathrm{V}(a_i b_i) (formula (3)); every element of aibia_i b_i is therefore nilpotent (Corollary 2 to Proposition 11); let pp be an integer such that aipbip=0a_i^p b_i^p = 0. Then Ui⊂V(Aai)=V(Aaip)U_i \subset \mathrm{V}(Aa_i) = \mathrm{V}(Aa_i^p),

Zi⊂V(Abi)=V(Abip) Z_i \subset \mathrm{V}(Ab_i) = \mathrm{V}(Ab_i^p)

and V(Aai)∩V(Abi)=V(Aai+Abi)=∅V(Aa_i) \cap V(Ab_i) = V(Aa_i + Ab_i) = \varnothing, hence Ui=V(Aaip)U_i = V(Aa_i^p) and Zi=V(Abip)Z_i = V(Ab_i^p), which establishes our assertion by replacing aia_i by AaipAa_i^p and bib_i by AbipAb_i^p. The ideals aia_i and bib_i thus chosen, it follows from the fact that σ\sigma is bijective that there exist two idempotents fi∈ai,ei∈bif_i \in a_i, e_i \in b_i such that 1=ei+fi,eifi=0,ai=Afi,bi=Aei1 = e_i + f_i, e_i f_i = 0, a_i = Af_i, b_i = Ae_i. If i≠ji \neq j, then X=Z,∪Zj=V(Aeiej)X = Z, \cup Z_j = V(Ae_i e_j), and as eieje_i e_j is idempotent, Lemma 2 shows that eiej=0e_i e_j = 0. Finally e=∑i∈Ieie = \sum_{i \in I} e_i is idempotent and ei∈Aee_i \in Ae for all i∈Ii \in I, whence V(Ae)⊂ZV(Ae) \subset Z, for all ii; it follows that

V(Ae)=∅=V(A.1) V(Ae) = \varnothing = V(A.1)

and Lemma 2 shows also that e=1e = 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.