Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 04EX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04EX].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules

Let AA be a principal ideal domain and PP a representative system of extremal elements of AA (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 1, no. 3). The topology on AA with respect to which the ideals ≠0\neq 0 of A\mathbf{A} form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0, which is compatible with the ring structure on A\mathbf{A}, is Hausdorff and the completion of A\mathbf{A} with this topology is canonically isomorphic to the product of the completions of A\mathbf{A} with respect to the xx-adic topologies, where xx runs through PP.

The principal ideals (x)(x) where π∈P\pi \in P are maximal and distinct and hence relatively prime, we have already seen (no. 12, Example 3) that the xx-adic topologies are Hausdorff and hence so is the topology defined in the statement of Proposition 17, which is finer than each of the xx-adic topologies.

If the Corollary to Proposition 17 is applied when A=Z\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{Z}, we denote by Z^\hat{\mathbf{Z}} the completion of Z\mathbf{Z} with respect to the topology for which all the ideals ≠0\neq 0 of Z\mathbf{Z} form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0, the ring isomorphic to the product ∏p∈PZp\prod_{p \in P} \mathbf{Z}_p of the rings of pp-adic integers (P being the set of prime numbers).

Remarks

(1) Clearly, under the conditions of Proposition 17, the topology T\mathscr{T} is the least upper bound of the mλm_\lambda-adic topologies on A\mathbf{A}.

(2) Every closed ideal aa of ∏λ∈LA^λ\prod_{\lambda \in L} \hat{A}_\lambda is identical with the product of its projections aλ=prλ(a)a_\lambda = \mathrm{pr}_\lambda(a), which are closed ideals in the AλA_\lambda; for A^λ\hat{A}_\lambda is canonically identified with a closed ideal Aλ′A'_\lambda of ∏λA^λ\prod_{\lambda} \hat{A}_\lambda and aλa_\lambda with a∩Aλ′a \cap A'_\lambda (Algebra, Chapter I, §8, no. 10, Proposition 6), the sum of the aλa_\lambda is dense in the product ∏λaλ\prod_\lambda a_\lambda (General Topology, Chapter III, §2, no. 9, Proposition 25) and the latter is closed in ∏λA^λ\prod_\lambda \hat{A}_\lambda, whence our assertion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.