Given a commutative topological ring A, a formal power series
T=(ni)∑cn1n2…npX1n1X2n2…Xpnp in the ring
A[[X1,…,Xp]] is called restricted if, for every neighbourhood
V of 0 in
A, there is only a finite number of coefficients
cn1n2…np not belonging to
V (in other words, the family
(cn1n2…np) tends to 0 in
A with respect to the filter of complements of finite subsets of
Np).
If A is linearly topologized, the restricted formal power series in A[[X1,…,Xp]] form a subring of A[[X1,…,Xp]], denoted by A{X1,…,Xp}: for if
T=(ni)∑cn1…npX1n1…Xpnp,T′=(ni)∑cn1…np′X1n1…Xpnp are two restricted formal power series and
J a neighbourhood of 0 in
A which is an ideal of
A, there exists an integer
m such that
cn1…np∈z and
cn1…np′∈g for every system
(n1,…,np) such that
nk≥m for at least one index
k; now, if
T′′=TT′=(ni)∑cn1…np′′X1n1…Xpnp,
then cn1…np′′=∑cr1…rpcs1…sp′ for all systems (rk),(sk) such that rk+sk=nk for 1≤k≤p; we conclude that if nk≥2m, then rk≥m or sk≥m and hence, since z is an ideal, cn1…np′′∈g so long as nk≥2m for at least one k, which establishes our assertion. Moreover, every derivative ∂T/∂Xi (1≤i≤p) of a restricted formal power series is restricted, as follows immediately from the definition and the fact that the neighbourhoods z∈B are additive subgroups of A.
If A is discrete, the ring of restricted formal power series is just the polynomial ring A[X1,…,Xn].
Let us always assume that A is linearly topologized and let B be a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 in A consisting of ideals of A; for all g∈B, let pg:A→A/g be the canonical homomorphism. By definition, for every restricted formal power series T∈A{X1,…,Xn},
pˉg(T)∈(A/g)[X1,…,Xp].
Clearly
((A/g)[X1,…,Xp],hˉgg′)
is an inverse system of rings (relative to the directed indexing set B) and (pˉg) is an inverse system of homomorphisms A{X1,…,Xn}→(A/g)[X1,…,Xp]; as every polynomial is a restricted formal power series, pˉg is surjective; its kernel Ng is the ideal of A{X1,…,Xn} consisting of the restricted formal power series all of whose coefficients belong to g; we shall give A{X1,…,Xn} the (linear) topology for which the Ng (for g∈B) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 (a topology which obviously depends only on that on A). Then it follows from General Topology, Chapter III, § 7, no. 3, Proposition 2 that
π=←limpˉg:A{X1,…,Xn}→→lim(A/g)[X1,…,Xp]
is a strict morphism whose kernel is the closure of {0} in A{X1,…,Xn} and whose image is dense in
A′=→lim(A/g)[X1,…,Xn].
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.