Proposition 3
Tag 04IW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04IW].
Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 5. Flatness properties of filtered modules
Let be a commutative ring, a commutative -algebra, an ideal of and a -module. Suppose that is a Noetherian ring and a flat -module and that is ideally Hausdorff with respect to . The following conditions are equivalent: (a) is a flat -module. (b) is a flat -module and is a flat -module. If further the canonical homomorphism is bijective, conditions (a) and (b) are also equivalent to: (c) is a flat -module.
Condition (a) implies (b) by Chapter I, §2, no. 7, Corollaries 2 and 3 to Proposition 8 and the fact that is isomorphic to . Suppose condition (b) holds; to show that is a flat -module, we shall apply Theorem 1 of no. 2 with replaced by and by . It will therefore be sufficient to show that the canonical mapping is injective. Let be the canonical mapping and the canonical isomorphism is the canonical mapping , as is easily verified. Now is an isomorphism since is a flat -module, whilst is an isomorphism because is flat over is then an isomorphism.
Let be the canonical homomorphism; the -module structure on derived by means of from its -module structure is isomorphic to that on . Then it follows that, if is a flat -module, is a flat -module and hence also a flat -module if is an isomorphism; we have thus proved that (c) (b) in that case.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.