Bourbaki

Proposition 14

Tag 04NV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04NV].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 1. Notion of an integral element

Let AA be a completely integrally closed domain. Then every polynomial ring A[X1,…,Xn]A[X_1, \ldots, X_n] (resp. every ring of formal power series A[[X1,…,Xn]]A[[X_1, \ldots, X_n]]) is completely integrally closed.

By induction on nn, it is sufficient to prove that A[X]A[X] (resp. A[[X]]A[[X]]) is completely integrally closed. Then let PP be an element of the field of fractions of A[X]A[X] (resp. A[[X]]A[[X]]) and suppose that there exists a non-zero element Q∈A[X]Q \in A[X] (resp. Q∈A[[X]]Q \in A[[X]]) such that QPm∈A[X]Q P^m \in A[X] (resp. QP′′∈A[[X]]Q P'' \in A[[X]]) for every integer m≥0m \geq 0. If KK is the field of fractions of AA, A[X]A[X] (resp. A[[X]]A[[X]]) is a subring of K[X]K[X] (resp. K[[X]]K[[X]]) and K[X]K[X] (resp. K[[X]]K[[X]]) is a principal ideal domain (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 1, no. 1) and hence integrally closed (no. 4, Proposition 10) and Noetherian (Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 2, no. 3) and therefore completely integrally closed; then we have already seen that

P∈K[X]P \in K[X] (resp. P∈K[[X]]P \in K[[X]]). Let P=∑k=0∞akXkP = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k X^k (ak∈Ka_k \in K) and Q=∑k=0∞bkXkQ = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} b_k X^k (bk∈Ab_k \in A) and we argue by reductio ad absurdum by supposing that the aia_i do not all belong to AA; then there is a least index ii such that ai∉Aa_i \notin A; if we write

P1=∑k=0i−1akXk∈A[X], P_1 = \sum_{k=0}^{i-1} a_k X^k \in A[X],

it follows immediately from the hypothesis that also Q(P−P1)m∈A[X]Q(P - P_1)^m \in A[X] (resp. Q(P−P1)m∈A[[X]]Q(P - P_1)^m \in A[[X]]) for all m≥0m \geq 0. Let jj be the least integer such that bj≠0b_j \neq 0; clearly in Q(P−P1)mQ(P - P_1)^m the term of least degree with a coefficient ≠0\neq 0 is bjaimXj+mib_j a_i^m X^{j + mi} and hence bjaim∈Ab_j a_i^m \in A for all m≥0m \geq 0; but as AA is completely integrally closed this implies ai∈Aa_i \in A, contrary to the hypothesis.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.