Proposition 17
Tag 04O3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04O3].
Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 1. Notion of an integral element
*Let be a ring, a (commutative) -algebra and a square matrix of order over ; the following properties are equivalent:
(a) is integral over .
(b) There exists a finitely generated sub--module of such that for all and is a system of generators of the -module .
(c) The coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of are integral over .*
If is the characteristic polynomial of , the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem shows that (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 5, no. 4, Remark 1) and, as is a monic polynomial, (c) implies (a) by no. 1, Proposition 6.
Suppose in the second place that (a) holds. If is the canonical basis of , the sub--module of generated by the () is a finitely generated -module, since the -algebra is a finitely generated -module (no. 1, Theorem 1); as contains the , it is seen that (a) implies (b); the converse is a consequence of no. 1, Theorem 1, condition (E_{III}).
Finally let us prove that (a) implies (c); as is integral over and a fortiori over the polynomial ring , is also integral over and by no. 3, Proposition 12 the problem is seen to reduce (by replacing by and by ) to proving that, if is integral over , is an element of which is integral over . Now, we have seen above that the endomorphism of defined by leaves stable a finitely generated sub--module containing the ; the -vectors , where for , therefore generate in a finitely generated sub--module containing , and which is stable under , in other words under the homothety of ratio ; as the annihilator of
in B reduces to 0, condition (E_{III}) of no. 1, Theorem 1 proves that d is integral over A.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.