Bourbaki

Proposition 17

Tag 04O3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04O3].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 1. Notion of an integral element

*Let AA be a ring, BB a (commutative) AA-algebra and XX a square matrix of order nn over BB; the following properties are equivalent:

(a) XX is integral over AA.

(b) There exists a finitely generated sub-AA-module MM of BnB^n such that X.x∈MX.x \in M for all x∈Mx \in M and MM is a system of generators of the BB-module BnB^n.

(c) The coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of XX are integral over AA.*

If χ(T)=det⁡(T.1−X)\chi(T) = \det(T.1 - X) is the characteristic polynomial of XX, the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem shows that χ(X)=0\chi(X) = 0 (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 5, no. 4, Remark 1) and, as χ\chi is a monic polynomial, (c) implies (a) by no. 1, Proposition 6.

Suppose in the second place that (a) holds. If (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is the canonical basis of BnB^n, the sub-AA-module MM of BB generated by the Xk.eiX^k.e_i (1≤i≤n,k≥01 \leq i \leq n, k \geq 0) is a finitely generated AA-module, since the AA-algebra A[X]A[X] is a finitely generated AA-module (no. 1, Theorem 1); as MM contains the eie_i, it is seen that (a) implies (b); the converse is a consequence of no. 1, Theorem 1, condition (E_{III}).

Finally let us prove that (a) implies (c); as XX is integral over AA and a fortiori over the polynomial ring A[T]A[T], T.1−XT.1 - X is also integral over A[T]A[T] and by no. 3, Proposition 12 the problem is seen to reduce (by replacing XX by T.1−XT.1 - X and AA by A[T]A[T]) to proving that, if XX is integral over AA, d=det⁡(X)d = \det(X) is an element of BB which is integral over AA. Now, we have seen above that the endomorphism uu of BnB^n defined by XX leaves stable a finitely generated sub-AA-module MM containing the eie_i; the nn-vectors x1∧x2∧…∧xnx_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge x_n, where xi∈Mx_i \in M for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n, therefore generate in ⋀n(Bn)\bigwedge^n(B^n) a finitely generated sub-AA-module containing e1∧e2∧…∧ee_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge e, and which is stable under ⋀nu\bigwedge^n u, in other words under the homothety of ratio dd; as the annihilator of

e1∧e2∧…∧e, e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge e,

in B reduces to 0, condition (E_{III}) of no. 1, Theorem 1 proves that d is integral over A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.