Proposition 2
Tag 04T5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04T5].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 3. Valuations
Let be a (not necessarily commutative) field and a valuation on with values in . Then: (i) For , . (ii) The set of such that is a subring of . (iii) For all in , the set , (resp. ) of such that (resp. ) is a two-sided ideal of and every (left or right) ideal of contains of the . (iv) The set of such that is the greatest ideal in ; is the set of invertible elements of and is a (not necessarily commutative) field. (v) For all , .
Assertion (i) follows from the fact that is an ideal of not equal to . The verification of the fact that is a ring and the , and two-sided ideals is trivial by virtue of axioms (VL), (VL) and (VL). If is a (left, for example) ideal of and belongs to , every such that can be written where , hence and therefore ; in other words the left ideal contains the for . The set is the set of such that ; if , then
(resp. , ) is called the ring (resp. ideal, residue field) of the valuation on .
Clearly U(A) is the kernel of the homomorphism and the image under of the multiplicative group is a subgroup of the additive group , called the order group or value group of , which is therefore isomorphic to ; for , the element of is sometimes called the valuation or order of for . Two valuations on are called equivalent if they have the same ring.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.