Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 04T5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04T5].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 3. Valuations

Let KK be a (not necessarily commutative) field and vv a valuation on KK with values in Γ\Gamma. Then: (i) For x≠0x \neq 0, v(x)≠+∞v(x) \neq +\infty. (ii) The set AA of x∈Kx \in K such that v(x)≥Ov(x) \geq O is a subring of KK. (iii) For all a≥Oa \geq O in Γ\Gamma, the set VV, (resp. Va′V'_a) of x∈Ax \in A such that v(x)>av(x) > a (resp. v(x)≥av(x) \geq a) is a two-sided ideal of AA and every (left or right) ideal ≠(O)\neq (O) of AA contains mm of the Va′V'_a. (iv) The set m(A)m(A) of x∈Ax \in A such that v(x)>Ov(x) > O is the greatest ideal #A\#A in AA; U(A)=A−m(A)U(A) = A - m(A) is the set of invertible elements of AA and κ(A):=A/m(A)\kappa(A) := A/m(A) is a (not necessarily commutative) field. (v) For all x∈K−Ax \in K - A, x−1∈m(A)x^{-1} \in m(A).

Assertion (i) follows from the fact that vˉ−1(+∞)\bar{v}^{-1}(+\infty) is an ideal of KK not equal to KK. The verification of the fact that AA is a ring and the VV, and Va′V'_a two-sided ideals is trivial by virtue of axioms (VLI_I), (VLII_II) and (VLIII_III). If aa is a (left, for example) ideal of AA and x≠0x \neq 0 belongs to AA, every y∈Ay \in A such that v(y)≥v(x)v(y) \geq v(x) can be written y=zxy = zx where z=yx−1z = yx^{-1}, hence v(z)=v(y)−v(x)≥Ov(z) = v(y) - v(x) \geq O and therefore z∈Az \in A; in other words the left ideal AxAx contains the Va′V'_a for a>v(x)a > v(x). The set U(A)=A−m(A)U(A) = A - m(A) is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that v(x)=0v(x) = 0; if x∈U(A)x \in U(A), then

v(x−1)=−v(x)=0, v(x^{-1}) = -v(x) = 0,
whence x−1∈U(A)x^{-1} \in U(A); conversely, if y∈Ay \in A is invertible in AA, then v(y)≥0v(y) \geq 0, v(y−1)≥0v(y^{-1}) \geq 0 and v(y)+v(y−1)=0v(y) + v(y^{-1}) = 0, whence v(y)=0v(y) = 0 and y∈U(A)y \in U(A); this proves (iv) and (v) follows immediately from the definitions.

AA (resp. m(A)m(A), κ(A)\kappa(A)) is called the ring (resp. ideal, residue field) of the valuation vv on KK.

Clearly U(A) is the kernel of the homomorphism v:K∗→Γv : K^* \to \Gamma and the image v(K∗)v(K^*) under vv of the multiplicative group K∗K^* is a subgroup of the additive group Γ\Gamma, called the order group or value group of vv, which is therefore isomorphic to K∗/U(A)K^*/U(A); for x∈Kx \in K, the element v(x)v(x) of Γ∞\Gamma_\infty is sometimes called the valuation or order of xx for vv. Two valuations v,v′v, v' on KK are called equivalent if they have the same ring.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.