Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 04WW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04WW].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 8. Extensions of a valuation to an algebraic extension

Let K be a field, vv a valuation on K, A its ring, L an algebraic extension of K and A′A' the integral closure of A in L. Let 23 be the set of valuation rings on L which extend vv and M′\mathfrak{M}' the set of maximal ideals of A′A'. Then the mapping V↦m(V)∩A′V \mapsto m(V) \cap A' is a bijection of 23 onto M′\mathfrak{M}' and m′↦Am′′m' \mapsto A'_{m'} is the inverse bijection.

Every maximal ideal m′m' of A′A' is such that m′∩Am' \cap A is the maximal ideal of A (Chapter V, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 1) and Am′′A'_{m'} is dominated by a valuation ring V of L (which is therefore the ring of a valuation on L extending vv) (§1§ 1, no. 2, Corollary to Theorem 2). The field L is the union of a directed family of sub-extensions K, of L which are finite over K and it will suffice, in order to see that V=Am′′V = A'_{m'}, to prove that V∩K=Am′′∩KV \cap K = A'_{m'} \cap K, for all α\alpha. Now, if we write Aα′=A′∩KαA'_\alpha = A' \cap K_\alpha, Aα′A'_\alpha is the integral closure of A in K, and hence is the intersection of the rings of the valuations on K, which extend vv and these rings VαV_\alpha are finite in number and are the local rings (Aα′)i∣mα(A'_\alpha)_{i|m_\alpha} of Aα′A'_\alpha (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n), where the miα′m'_{i\alpha} are the distinct maximal ideals of Aα′A'_\alpha (no. 3, Remark); but m′∩Aα′m' \cap A'_\alpha is one of the miα′m'_{i\alpha} and V∩KαV \cap K_\alpha is therefore equal to the corresponding local ring (Aα′)miα′⊂Am′′(A'_\alpha)_{m'_{i\alpha}} \subset A'_{m'}, which completes the proof that V=Am′′V = A'_{m'}. Conversely, if V∈VV \in \mathfrak{V}, then A′⊂VA' \subset V (§ 3, no. 3, Proposition 6) and, if m′=m(V)∩A′m' = m(V) \cap A', then m′∩A=mm' \cap A = m, hence m′m' is a maximal ideal of A′A' (Chapter V, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 1) and the above argument shows that V=Am′′V = A'_{m'}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.