Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 04Y6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04Y6].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 10. Extensions of a valuation to a transcendental extension

Let KK be a field, vv a valuation on KK, Γ\Gamma its order group, Γ′\Gamma' a totally ordered group containing Γ\Gamma and ξ\xi an element of Γ′\Gamma' such that the relations nξ∈Γ,n∈Zn\xi \in \Gamma, n \in \mathbf{Z} imply n=0n = 0. Then there exists a unique valuation w on K(X)K(X) with values in Γ′\Gamma' and extending vv such that w(X)=ξw(X) = \xi. The residue field of w is equal to that of vv and its order group is the subgroup Γ+Zξ\Gamma + \mathbf{Z}\xi of Γ′\Gamma'.

We show first the uniqueness of w. Let P=∑jajXjP = \sum_j a_j X^j be an element of K[X]K[X]. Then w(ajXj)=v(aj)+jξw(a_j X^j) = v(a_j) + j\xi, which shows that the monomials ajXja_j X^j such that aj≠0a_j \neq 0 have distinct values for w. It follows that w(P)=inf⁡j(v(aj)+jξ)w(P) = \inf_j (v(a_j) + j\xi), which shows both the uniqueness of w on K[X]K[X] (hence also on K(X)K(X)) and the fact that the order group of w is Γ+Zξ\Gamma + \mathbf{Z}\xi. It is further seen that, if P≠0P \neq 0, we may write P=aXn(1+u)P = a X^n (1 + u), where a∈K∗,n∈N,u∈K(X)a \in K^*, n \in \mathbf{N}, u \in K(X) and w(u)>0w(u) > 0; every element R≠0R \neq 0 of K(X)K(X) can therefore be written in the form

R=bXn(1+u′), R = b X^n (1 + u'),
where b∈K∗,n∈Z,u′∈K(X)b \in K^*, n \in \mathbf{Z}, u' \in K(X) and w(u′)>0w(u') > 0; then w(R)=v(b)+nξw(R) = v(b) + n \xi, hence w(R)=0w(R) = 0 if and only if v(b)=0v(b) = 0 and n=0n = 0; thus, when w(R)=0w(R) = 0, RR and bb are congruent modulo the ideal of ww, which shows that the residue field of ww is equal to that of vv.

Finally the existence of ww follows from Lemma 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.