Definition 1
Tag 04YL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YL].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains
Let be an integral domain and its field of fractions. Every sub-A-module of such that there exists an element in for which is called a fractional ideal of (or of , by an abuse of language).
Every finitely generated sub-A-module of is a fractional ideal: for if is a system of generators of , we may write , where , and ; if , clearly . In particular the monogenous sub-A-modules of are fractional ideals (recall that they have been called fractional principal ideals in Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 5). If is Noetherian, every fractional ideal is afinitely generated A-module. Every sub-A-module of a fractional ideal of is a fractional ideal. Every ideal of is a fractional ideal; to avoid confusion, these will also be called the integral ideals of .
We denote by the set of non-zero fractional ideals of . Given two elements of , we shall write (or ) for the relation "every fractional principal ideal containing also contains "; clearly this relation is a preordering on . Let denote the associated equivalence relation " and " (Set Theory, Chapter III, § 1, no. 2) and the quotient set ; we shall say that the elements of are the divisors of and, for every fractional ideal , we shall denote by (or ) the canonical image of in and we shall say that is the divisor of ; if is a fractional principal ideal, we write div(x) instead of div(Ax) and div(x) is called the divisor of x; the elements of D(A) of the form div(x) are called principal divisors. By taking the quotient, the preordering on I(A) defines on D(A) an ordering which we shall denote by .
For all there exists by hypothesis some in A such that ; the intersection of the fractional principal ideals containing a is therefore an element of I(A). Clearly the relation is equivalent to the relation ; the relation therefore implies . For two elements of I(A) to be equivalent modulo R, it is necessary and sufficient that .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.