Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 04YR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YR].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains

Let a,a′,b,b′a, a', b, b' be elements of I(A)I(A). The relations a>a′a > a' and b>b′b > b' imply ab>a′b′ab > a'b'.

We may restrict our attention to the case where b=b′b = b'. Then let AxAx be a fractional principal ideal containing a′ba'b; for every non-zero element yy of bb, Ax⊃a′yAx \supset a'y and hence Axy−1⊃a′Axy^{-1} \supset a', whence Axy−1⊃aAxy^{-1} \supset a and Ax⊃ayAx \supset ay. Varying yy, it is seen that Ax⊃abAx \supset ab, whence ab>a′bab > a'b.

It follows from Proposition 3 that multiplication on I(A)I(A) defines, by passing to the quotient, a law of composition on D(A)D(A) which is obviously associative and commutative. It is written additively so that we may write:

div(ab)=div a+div b, \text{div}(ab) = \text{div } a + \text{div } b,

for a,ba, b in I(A)I(A). Clearly div(1)\text{div}(1) is an identity element for this addition; this element is denoted by 0. Proposition 3 proves further that the order structure on D(A)D(A) is compatible with this addition (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 1) and, more precisely (no. 1, Proposition 2 (ii)):

inf⁡(div a+div b,div a+div c)=inf⁡(div(ab),div(ac))=div(ab+ac)=div(a(b+c))=diva+div(b+c)=diva+inf⁡(div b,div c). \inf(\text{div } a + \text{div } b, \text{div } a + \text{div } c) = \inf(\text{div}(ab), \text{div}(ac)) = \text{div}(ab + ac) = \text{div}(a(b + c)) = \text{div} a + \text{div}(b + c) = \text{div} a + \inf(\text{div } b, \text{div } c).

For a fractional ideal a≠0a \neq 0 to be such that div a≥0\text{div } a \geq 0 in D(A)D(A), it is necessary and sufficient that a⊂Aa \subset A (in other words, that aa be an integral ideal of AA).

For two elements x,yx, y of K∗K^*, the relation div(x)=div(y)\text{div}(x) = \text{div}(y) is equivalent to Ax=AyAx = Ay; the set of principal divisors of AA with the order relation and the monoid law induced by that on D(A)D(A) is an ordered group canonically isomorphic to the multiplicative group of fractional principal ideals ordered by the opposite order relation to inclusion (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 5). The relation SS between two elements P,QP, Q of D(A)D(A):

"there exists x∈K∗x \in K^* such that P=Q+div(x)P = Q + \text{div}(x)"

is therefore an equivalence relation since the relation P=Q+div(x)P = Q + \text{div}(x) is equivalent to Q=P+div(x−1)Q = P + \text{div}(x^{-1}); if PP and QQ are congruent modulo SS, they are called equivalent divisors of AA. Clearly moreover the relation SS is compatible with the law of the monoid D(A)D(A) and the latter therefore defines, by taking quotients, a monoid structure on D(A)/SD(A)/S; this monoid is called the divisor class monoid of A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.