Proposition 3
Tag 04YR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YR].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains
Let be elements of . The relations and imply .
We may restrict our attention to the case where . Then let be a fractional principal ideal containing ; for every non-zero element of , and hence , whence and . Varying , it is seen that , whence .
It follows from Proposition 3 that multiplication on defines, by passing to the quotient, a law of composition on which is obviously associative and commutative. It is written additively so that we may write:
for in . Clearly is an identity element for this addition; this element is denoted by 0. Proposition 3 proves further that the order structure on is compatible with this addition (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 1) and, more precisely (no. 1, Proposition 2 (ii)):
For a fractional ideal to be such that in , it is necessary and sufficient that (in other words, that be an integral ideal of ).
For two elements of , the relation is equivalent to ; the set of principal divisors of with the order relation and the monoid law induced by that on is an ordered group canonically isomorphic to the multiplicative group of fractional principal ideals ordered by the opposite order relation to inclusion (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 5). The relation between two elements of :
"there exists such that "
is therefore an equivalence relation since the relation is equivalent to ; if and are congruent modulo , they are called equivalent divisors of . Clearly moreover the relation is compatible with the law of the monoid and the latter therefore defines, by taking quotients, a monoid structure on ; this monoid is called the divisor class monoid of A.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.