Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 050V, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 050V].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 2. Dedekind domains

Let AA be a Noetherian domain such that every non-zero prime ideal &A\& A is maximal, MM a torsion-free AA-module of finite rank rr and a non-zero element of AA. Then A/AaA/Aa is an AA-module of finite length and:

long⁡A(M/aM)≤r⋅long⁡A(A/Aa). \operatorname{long}_A(M/aM) \leq r \cdot \operatorname{long}_A(A/Aa).
Lemma 1 shows that long⁡A(A/Aa)\operatorname{long}_A(A/Aa) is finite. We show (6) first in the case where MM is finitely generated. As MM is torsion-free and of rank rr, there exists a submodule LL of MM which is isomorphic to A′A' and such that Q=M/LQ = M/L is a finitely generated torsion AA-module and hence of finite length (Lemma 1). For every integer n≥1n \geq 1, the kernel of the canonical surjection M/anM→Q/anQM/a^nM \to Q/a^nQ is equal to (L+anM)/anM(L + a^nM)/a^nM and isomorphic to L/(anM∩L)L/(a^nM \cap L); as
anL⊂anM∩L, a^nL \subset a^nM \cap L,
therefore
long⁡A(M/anM)≤long⁡A(L/anL)+long⁡A(Q/anQ)≤long⁡A(L/anL)+long⁡A(Q). \operatorname{long}_A(M/a^nM) \leq \\ \operatorname{long}_A(L/a^nL) + \operatorname{long}_A(Q/a^nQ) \leq \operatorname{long}_A(L/a^nL) + \operatorname{long}_A(Q).
Now, since MM is torsion-free, multiplication by aa defines an isomorphism of

M/aM onto aA/a^2M; similarly for L; whence, by induction on n, the formulae:

longA(M/anM)=n⋅longA(M/aM). \text{long}_A(M/a^nM) = n \cdot \text{long}_A(M/aM).
longA(L/anL)=n⋅longA(L/aL). \text{long}_A(L/a^nL) = n \cdot \text{long}_A(L/aL).

Taking account of (7) we deduce:

longA(M/aM)≤longA(L/aL)+n−1longA(Q) \text{long}_A(M/aM) \leq \text{long}_A(L/aL) + n^{-1}\text{long}_A(Q)

for all n>0n > 0; as L is isomorphic to A', longA(L/aL)=rlongA(A/Aa)\text{long}_A(L/aL) = r \text{long}_A(A/Aa); whence (6) by letting nn tend to infinity in (9).

We now pass to the general case. Let (Mi)(M_i) be the family of finitely generated submodules of M. The module T=M/aMT = M/aM is the union of the submodules Ti=(Mi+aM)/aM=Mi/(Mi∩aM)T_i = (M_i + aM)/aM = M_i/(M_i \cap aM). Now, T, is isomorphic to a quotient of Mi/aMiM_i/aM_i and hence

longA(Ti)≤rlongA(A/Aa) \text{long}_A(T_i) \leq r \text{long}_A(A/Aa)

by what we have just proved. Whence

longA(T)≤rlongA(A/Aa) \text{long}_A(T) \leq r \text{long}_A(A/Aa)

by Lemma 2.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.