Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0510, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0510].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 2. Dedekind domains

Let AA be a Dedekind domain, KK its field of fractions, LL a finite extension of KK and BB the integral closure of AA in LL. Let pp be a non-zero prime ideal of AA, vv the corresponding essential valuation of KK and

Bp=∏ipie(i) Bp = \prod_i p_i^{e(i)}

the decomposition of the ideal BpBp as a product of prime ideals. Then: (a) the prime ideals of BB lying above pp are the pip_i such that e(i)>0e(i) > 0; (b) the valuations viv_i on LL corresponding to these ideals pip_i are, up to equivalence, the valuations on LL extending vv; (c) [B/pi:A/p]=f(vi/v);[B/p_i : A/p] = f(v_i/v); (d) ei=e(vi/v)e_i = e(v_i/v) (cf. Chapter VI, § 8, no. 1, Definitions 1 and 2).

(a) To say that a prime ideal qq of BB lies above pp amounts to saying that q⊇pq \supseteq p, hence that q⊇Bpq \supseteq Bp and that qq contains one of the pip_i such that e(i)>0e(i) > 0 (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1). (b) This follows, taking account of (a), from § 1, no. 8, Corollary to Proposition 12. (c) The residue field of vv is identified with A/pA/p and that of viv_i with B/piB/p_i (§ 1, no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6).

(d) Let aa (resp. aia_i) be a uniformizer for vv (resp. viv_i). Then

aBpi=aApBpi=pApBpi=pB.Bpi=(∏jpje(j))Bpi=∏j(pjBpi)e(j)=(piBpi)e(i)=aie(i)Bpi a B_{p_i} = a A_p B_{p_i} = p A_p B_{p_i} = p B . B_{p_i} = \left( \prod_j p_j^{e(j)} \right) B_{p_i} = \prod_j (p_j B_{p_i})^{e(j)} \\ = (p_i B_{p_i})^{e(i)} = a_i^{e(i)} B_{p_i}
since pjBpi=Bjp_j B_{p_i} = B_j for j≠ij \neq i; whence (d), since e(vi/v)=vi(a)e(v_i/v) = v_i(a).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.