Proposition 6
Tag 0510, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0510].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 2. Dedekind domains
Let be a Dedekind domain, its field of fractions, a finite extension of and the integral closure of in . Let be a non-zero prime ideal of , the corresponding essential valuation of and
the decomposition of the ideal as a product of prime ideals. Then: (a) the prime ideals of lying above are the such that ; (b) the valuations on corresponding to these ideals are, up to equivalence, the valuations on extending ; (c) (d) (cf. Chapter VI, § 8, no. 1, Definitions 1 and 2).
(a) To say that a prime ideal of lies above amounts to saying that , hence that and that contains one of the such that (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1). (b) This follows, taking account of (a), from § 1, no. 8, Corollary to Proposition 12. (c) The residue field of is identified with and that of with (§ 1, no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6).
(d) Let (resp. ) be a uniformizer for (resp. ). Then
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.