Let f(X1,X2,…,Xn) be a formal power series =0 with coefficients in a ring E. There exist integers u(i)⩾1 (1⩽i⩽n−1) such that
f(Tu(1),…,Tu(n−1),T)=0.
Suppose that integers u(i)⩾1 (1⩽i⩽k−1) are determined such that f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xk,…,Xn)=0. We shall determine an integer u(k)⩾1 such that
f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xnu(k),Xk+1,…,Xn)=0.
The lemma will then be proved by induction.
Observe that the series f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xk,…,X) can be considered as a series in Xk and Xn with coefficients in E[[Xk+1,…,Xn−1]]. Thus we see that it suffices to establish the lemma for n=2.
Therefore let
f=i,j∑eijXiYj∈E[[X,Y]] where
f=0. Let
G⊂N×N be the non-empty set of ordered pairs
(i,j) such that
eij=0. Let
N×N be given the lexicographical ordering. Let
(c,d) be the least element of
G. Choose an integer
p>d. In the expansion of
f(Tp,T)=(i,j)∈G∑eijTip+j we look for the terms of degree
cp+d. If
ip+j=cp+d,i≥c+1 is impossible, for this would give
ip+j≥(c+1)p+j≥(c+1)p>cp+d; nor is
i<c possible, for
(c,d) is the least element of
G; therefore
i=c and then
j=d. The term of degree
cp+d in
f(Tp,T) is therefore
ecdTcp+d. Since
ecd=0,f(Tp,T)=0. Whence the lemma.
In the ring E[[X1,…,Xn]], let a be the ideal of formal power series without constant term. If w1,…,wn are elements of a, recall that the mapping f(X1,…,Xn)↦f(w1,…,wn) is the unique endomorphism s of the ring E[[X1,…,Xn]] such that s(Xi)=wi for 1≤i≤n (Chapter III, § 4, no. 5, Proposition 6).
We take w1=X1+Xnu(1),…,wn−1=Xn−1+Xnu(n−1),wn=Xn, where the u(i) are integers ≥1. Let s′ be the endomorphism of E[[X1,…,Xn]] which maps X1 to X1−Xnu(1),…,Xn−1 to Xn−1−Xnu(n−1) and Xn to Xn. Then s′(s(Xi))=Xi for 1≤i≤n and hence s′∘s is the identity automorphism; similarly for s∘s′. Hence s is an automorphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.