Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 051X, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 051X].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 3. Factorial domains

Let f(X1,X2,…,Xn)f(X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n) be a formal power series ≠0\neq 0 with coefficients in a ring EE. There exist integers u(i)⩾1u(i) \geqslant 1 (1⩽i⩽n−11 \leqslant i \leqslant n - 1) such that

f(Tu(1),…,Tu(n−1),T)≠0. f(T^{u(1)}, \ldots, T^{u(n-1)}, T) \neq 0.

Suppose that integers u(i)⩾1u(i) \geqslant 1 (1⩽i⩽k−11 \leqslant i \leqslant k - 1) are determined such that f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xk,…,Xn)≠0f(X_n^{u(1)}, \ldots, X_n^{u(k-1)}, X_k, \ldots, X_n) \neq 0. We shall determine an integer u(k)⩾1u(k) \geqslant 1 such that

f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xnu(k),Xk+1,…,Xn)≠0. f(X_n^{u(1)}, \ldots, X_n^{u(k-1)}, X_n^{u(k)}, X_{k+1}, \ldots, X_n) \neq 0.

The lemma will then be proved by induction.

Observe that the series f(Xnu(1),…,Xnu(k−1),Xk,…,X)f(X_n^{u(1)}, \ldots, X_n^{u(k-1)}, X_k, \ldots, X) can be considered as a series in XkX_k and XnX_n with coefficients in E[[Xk+1,…,Xn−1]]E[[X_{k+1}, \ldots, X_{n-1}]]. Thus we see that it suffices to establish the lemma for n=2n = 2.

Therefore let

f=∑i,jeijXiYj∈E[[X,Y]] f = \sum_{i,j} e_{ij} X^i Y^j \in E[[X, Y]]
where f≠0f \neq 0. Let G⊂N×NG \subset \mathbf{N} \times \mathbf{N} be the non-empty set of ordered pairs (i,j)(i, j) such that eij≠0e_{ij} \neq 0. Let N×N\mathbf{N} \times \mathbf{N} be given the lexicographical ordering. Let (c,d)(c, d) be the least element of GG. Choose an integer p>dp > d. In the expansion of
f(Tp,T)=∑(i,j)∈GeijTip+j f(T^p, T) = \sum_{(i, j) \in G} e_{ij} T^{ip + j}
we look for the terms of degree cp+dcp + d. If ip+j=cp+d,i≥c+1ip + j = cp + d, i \geq c + 1 is impossible, for this would give
ip+j≥(c+1)p+j≥(c+1)p>cp+d; ip + j \geq (c + 1)p + j \geq (c + 1)p > cp + d;
nor is i<ci < c possible, for (c,d)(c, d) is the least element of GG; therefore i=ci = c and then j=dj = d. The term of degree cp+dcp + d in f(Tp,T)f(T^p, T) is therefore ecdTcp+de_{cd} T^{cp + d}. Since ecd≠0,f(Tp,T)≠0e_{cd} \neq 0, f(T^p, T) \neq 0. Whence the lemma.

In the ring E[[X1,…,Xn]]E[[X_1, \ldots, X_n]], let aa be the ideal of formal power series without constant term. If w1,…,wnw_1, \ldots, w_n are elements of aa, recall that the mapping f(X1,…,Xn)↦f(w1,…,wn)f(X_1, \ldots, X_n) \mapsto f(w_1, \ldots, w_n) is the unique endomorphism ss of the ring E[[X1,…,Xn]]E[[X_1, \ldots, X_n]] such that s(Xi)=wis(X_i) = w_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n (Chapter III, § 4, no. 5, Proposition 6).

We take w1=X1+Xnu(1),…,wn−1=Xn−1+Xnu(n−1),wn=Xnw_1 = X_1 + X_n^{u(1)}, \ldots, w_{n-1} = X_{n-1} + X_n^{u(n-1)}, w_n = X_n, where the u(i)u(i) are integers ≥1\geq 1. Let s′s' be the endomorphism of E[[X1,…,Xn]]E[[X_1, \ldots, X_n]] which maps X1X_1 to X1−Xnu(1),…,Xn−1X_1 - X_n^{u(1)}, \ldots, X_{n-1} to Xn−1−Xnu(n−1)X_{n-1} - X_n^{u(n-1)} and XnX_n to XnX_n. Then s′(s(Xi))=Xis'(s(X_i)) = X_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n and hence s′∘ss' \circ s is the identity automorphism; similarly for s∘s′s \circ s'. Hence ss is an automorphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.