Corollary
Tag 0533, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0533].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains
Let U, V, W be three vector spaces of finite rank over K and f: U × V → W a left non-degenerate K-bilinear mapping (Algebra, Chapter IX, § 1, no. 1, Definition 3). If M is a lattice of V and N a lattice of W, the set N: ,M of x ∈ U such thatf (x, y) ∈ N for ally ∈ M is a lattice of U.
Let be the K-linear mapping left associated with (Algebra, Chapter IX, loc. cit.) such that is the linear mapping ; recall that to say that is left non-degenerate means that is injective. By Proposition 3 (iv), is a lattice of ; as and is injective, the corollary follows from Proposition 3 (ii).
Examples
(4) Let be a (not necessarily associative) K-algebra of finite rank with a unit element; then the bilinear mapping of to is (left and right) non-degenerate. If and are lattices of with respect to , so are (Proposition 3 (iii)) and the set of such that (Corollary to Proposition 3). Note that there exists a sub-A-algebra of containing the unit element of which is a lattice of ; for consider a basis of such that is the unit element of and let be the multiplication table of (), so that (Kronecker symbols). Let be a non-zero and such that for all triplets of indices ; if we write for , then
for and ; the lattice of with basis and the () is a sub-A-algebra of with unit element .
(5) Let be a finite-dimensional vector space over and a non-degenerate bilinear form on . If is a lattice of , it follows from the Corollary to Proposition 3 that the set of such that for ally is also a lattice of ; if is the linear mapping left associated with (which is bijective), is just the dual lattice of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- Algebra, Chapter IX, § 1, no. 1, Definition 3 not yet on this site: A IX
- Proposition 3