Bourbaki

Definition 3

Tag 053K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 053K].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let MM and NN be two AA-modules and f:M→Nf : M \to N a homomorphism. ff is called pseudo-injective (resp. pseudo-surjective pseudo-zero) if Ker(f)\mathrm{Ker}(f) (resp. Coker(f)\mathrm{Coker}(f), Im(f)\mathrm{Im}(f)) is pseudo-zero; ff is called pseudo-bijective if it is both pseudo-injective and pseudo-surjective.

A pseudo-bijective homomorphism is also called a pseudo-isomorphism.

Suppose that MM and NN are finitely generated; then, for f:M→Nf : M \to N to be pseudo-injective (resp. pseudo-surjective, pseudo-zero), it is necessary and sufficient that, for all p∈P∪{{0}}p \in P \cup \{\{0\}\}, fp:Mp→Npf_p : M_p \to N_p, be injective (resp. surjective, zero); this follows from the flatness of the AA-module AA, (cf. Chapter I, § 2, no. 3, Remark 2).

Example (3) Let MM be a torsion-free finitely generated AA-module; then the canonical mapping cM:M→M∗∗c_M : M \to M^{**} of MM to its bidual is a pseudo-isomorphism. For MM is identified with a lattice of V=M⊗AKV = M \otimes_A K (no. 1, Proposition 1); we have seen that Mp=Mp∗∗M_p = M_p^{**} for all p∈Pp \in P (no. 2, Example 2) and, for p=0p = 0, MpM_p and Mp∗∗M_p^{**} are both equal to VV.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.