Bourbaki

Example

Tag 05HU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05HU].

Algebra, chapter I, § 8. Rings

Ideals and quotient rings of Z\mathbf{Z}

An ideal of Z\mathbf{Z} is an additive subgroup of Z\mathbf{Z} and hence of the form n.Zn.\mathbf{Z} with n⩾0n \geqslant 0; conversely, for every integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0, the set n.Zn.\mathbf{Z} is an ideal, the principal ideal (n)(n). Thus every ideal of Z\mathbf{Z} is principal and is represented uniquely in the form nZn\mathbf{Z} with n⩾0n \geqslant 0. The ideal (1)(1) is equal to Z\mathbf{Z}, the ideal (0)(0) consists of 0 and the ideals distinct from Z\mathbf{Z} and {0}\{0\} are therefore of the form nZn\mathbf{Z} with n>1n > 1. If m⩾1m \geqslant 1 and n⩾1n \geqslant 1, mZ⊃nZm\mathbf{Z} \supset n\mathbf{Z} if and only if n∈m.Zn \in m.\mathbf{Z}, that is mm divides nn. Therefore, for the ideal nZn\mathbf{Z} to be maximal, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist no integer m>1m > 1 distinct from nn and dividing nn; in other words, the maximal ideals of Z\mathbf{Z} are the ideals of the form pZp\mathbf{Z} where pp is a prime number (§ 4, no. 10, Definition 16).

Let mm and nn be two integers ⩾1\geqslant 1. The ideal mZ+nZm\mathbf{Z} + n\mathbf{Z} is principal, whence there is an integer d⩾1d \geqslant 1 characterized by dZ=mZ+nZd\mathbf{Z} = m\mathbf{Z} + n\mathbf{Z}; for every integer r \geqslant 1, the relation "r divides d" is equivalent to rZ⊃dZr\mathbf{Z} \supset d\mathbf{Z} and hence to "rZ⊃mZr\mathbf{Z} \supset m\mathbf{Z} and rZ⊃nZr\mathbf{Z} \supset n\mathbf{Z}", that is to "r divides m and n". It is thus seen that the common divisors of m and n are the divisors of d and that d is the greatest of the divisors ⩾1\geqslant 1 common to m and n; d is called the greatest common divisor (abbreviated to g.c.d.) of m and n. As dZ=mZ+nZd\mathbf{Z} = m\mathbf{Z} + n\mathbf{Z}, there exist two integers x and y such that d=mx+nyd = mx + ny. m and n are said to be relatively prime if their g.c.d. is equal to 1. It amounts to the same to assume that there exist integers x and y with mx+ny=1mx + ny = 1.

The intersection of the ideals mZm\mathbf{Z} and nZn\mathbf{Z} is non-zero for it contains mnmn and hence is of the form rZr\mathbf{Z} with r⩾1r \geqslant 1. Arguing as above, it is seen that the multiples of r are the common multiples of m and n and that r is the least of the integers ⩾1\geqslant 1 which are common multiples of m and n; it is called the least common multiple (l.c.m.) of m and n.

The product of the ideals mZm\mathbf{Z} and nZn\mathbf{Z} is the set of ∑i=1rmxinyi=mn(∑i=1rxiyi)\sum_{i=1}^{r} mx_i ny_i = mn \left( \sum_{i=1}^{r} x_i y_i \right) for x1,…,yr∈Zx_1, \ldots, y_r \in \mathbf{Z} and hence is equal to mnZmn\mathbf{Z}.

For every integer n⩾1n \geqslant 1, the quotient ring Z/nZ\mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z} is called the ring of integers modulo n; it has n elements, which are the classes modulo n of the integers 0, 1, 2, ..., n−1n - 1. For n=1n = 1, we obtain the zero ring.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.