Bourbaki

Proposition 23

Tag 05LT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05LT].

Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules

Let E be an A-module, the direct sum of an infinite family (M_i)_{i \in I} of non-zero submodules. For every generating system S of E, Card(S) \geq Card(I).

For all x \in S, let C_x be the finite set of indices i \in I such that the component of x in M_i is \neq 0 and let C = \bigcup_{x \in S} C_x. Every x \in S belongs by definition to the submodule of E the direct sum of the M_i for i \in C and the hypothesis that S generates E implies therefore that C = I; as I is by hypothesis infinite, so is S (Set Theory, III, § 5, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 1); therefore Card(I) = Card(C) \leq Card(S) (Set Theory, III, § 6, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Theorem 2).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.