Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 05LZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05LZ].

Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules

(1) Let KK be a field and AA a subring of KK with the following property: for every finite family (ξi)1≤i≤n(\xi_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of elements of KK, there exists a γ∈A\gamma \in A which is non-zero and such that γξi∈A\gamma \xi_i \in A for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n (a hypothesis which is always satisfied when AA is commutative and KK is the field of fractions of AA). Let EE be a vector space over KK and E[A]E_{[A]} the AA-module obtained by restricting the ring of scalars to AA. Then, if a family (xλ)λ∈L(x_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} is free in E[A]E_{[A]} it is also free in EE. Attention may be confined to the case where L={1,n}L = \{1, n\}; if there were a relation ∑i=1nξixi=0\sum_{i=1}^n \xi_i x_i = 0 with ξi∈K\xi_i \in K, the ξi\xi_i not all zero, it would follow that for all β∈A\beta \in A, ∑i=1n(βξi)xi=0\sum_{i=1}^n (\beta \xi_i) x_i = 0. By hypothesis we can suppose β≠0\beta \neq 0 in AA such that βξi=αi\beta \xi_i = \alpha_i belongs to AA for all ii; but the relation ∑i=1nαixi=0\sum_{i=1}^n \alpha_i x_i = 0 is contrary to the hypothesis, the αi\alpha_i being not all zero.

(2) If the ring homomorphism ρ:B→A\rho : B \to A is surjective and bb is its kernel (so that AA is canonically identified with B/bB/b), then, for every AA-module EE, bb is contained in the annihilator of ρ∗(E)\rho_*(E) and EE is the AA-module derived from ρ∗(E)\rho_*(E) by the process defined in no. 12.

Let A,BA, B be two rings and ρ:B→A\rho : B \to A a homomorphism. Let EE be an AA-module and FF a BB-module; a B-linear mapping u:F→ρ∗(E)u : F \to \rho_*(E) (also called a B-linear mapping of FF into EE if no confusion arises) is also called a semi-linear mapping (relative to ρ\rho) of the BB-module FF into the AA-module EE; it is also said that the ordered pair (u,ρ)(u, \rho) is a dimorphism of FF into EE; this therefore means that, for x∈F,y∈Fx \in F, y \in F and β∈B\beta \in B,

{u(x+y)=u(x)+u(y)u(βx)=ρ(β)u(x). \begin{cases} u(x + y) = u(x) + u(y) \\ u(\beta x) = \rho(\beta) u(x). \end{cases}

The set HomB(F,ρ∗(E))\mathrm{Hom}_B(F, \rho_*(E)) of BB-linear mappings of FF into EE is also written as HomB(F,E)\mathrm{Hom}_B(F, E) if no confusion can arise.

When ρ\rho is an isomorphism of BB onto AA, the relation u(βx)=ρ(β)u(x)u(\beta x) = \rho(\beta) u(x) for all β∈B\beta \in B may also be written as u(ρ′(α)x)=αxu(\rho'(\alpha)x) = \alpha x for all α∈A\alpha \in A, where ρ′\rho' denotes the inverse isomorphism of ρ\rho; to say that uu is semi-linear for ρ\rho is then equivalent to saying that uu is an A-linear mapping of ρ∗′(F)\rho'_*(F) into EE.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.