Remark
Tag 05LZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05LZ].
Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules
(1) Let be a field and a subring of with the following property: for every finite family of elements of , there exists a which is non-zero and such that for (a hypothesis which is always satisfied when is commutative and is the field of fractions of ). Let be a vector space over and the -module obtained by restricting the ring of scalars to . Then, if a family is free in it is also free in . Attention may be confined to the case where ; if there were a relation with , the not all zero, it would follow that for all , . By hypothesis we can suppose in such that belongs to for all ; but the relation is contrary to the hypothesis, the being not all zero.
(2) If the ring homomorphism is surjective and is its kernel (so that is canonically identified with ), then, for every -module , is contained in the annihilator of and is the -module derived from by the process defined in no. 12.
Let be two rings and a homomorphism. Let be an -module and a -module; a B-linear mapping (also called a B-linear mapping of into if no confusion arises) is also called a semi-linear mapping (relative to ) of the -module into the -module ; it is also said that the ordered pair is a dimorphism of into ; this therefore means that, for and ,
The set of -linear mappings of into is also written as if no confusion can arise.
When is an isomorphism of onto , the relation for all may also be written as for all , where denotes the inverse isomorphism of ; to say that is semi-linear for is then equivalent to saying that is an A-linear mapping of into .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.