Bourbaki

Definition 13

Tag 05M1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05M1].

Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules

Let (Aλ)λ∈L, (Bμ)μ∈M(A_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L},\ (B_\mu)_{\mu \in M} be two families of rings; an ((Aλ), (Bμ))((A_\lambda),\ (B_\mu))*-multimodule* (or multimodule over the families of rings (Aλ)λ∈L, (Bμ)μ∈M(A_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L},\ (B_\mu)_{\mu \in M}) is a set E with, for each λ∈L\lambda \in L, a left AλA_\lambda*-module structure and, for each* μ∈M\mu \in M, a right BμB_\mu*-module structure, all these module structures being compatible with one another.*

When the family (Bμ)(B_\mu) (resp. (Aλ)(A_\lambda)) is empty, E is called a left (resp. right) multimodule. When Card(L) + Card(M) = 2, we say "*bimodule*" instead of "*multimodule*"; it is then often convenient to consider (as can always be done by replacing a ring of operators by its opposite, cf. no. 1) a bimodule as having a left module structure with respect to a ring A and a right module structure with respect to a ring B, the permutability of the laws then being expressed by the relation

α(xβ)=(αx)βfor x∈E,α∈A,β∈B. \alpha(x\beta) = (\alpha x)\beta \quad \text{for } x \in E, \alpha \in A, \beta \in B.

It is then also said that E is an (A, B)-*bimodule*.

Two multimodule structures on a set E are said to be compatible if all the module structures on E which define one or the other of these multimodule structures are compatible with one another.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.