Bourbaki

Example

Tag 05M2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05M2].

Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules

(1) On a ring A the module structures of AsA_s and AdA_d are compatible and A can therefore be considered canonically as an (A, A)-bimodule.

(2) A left A-module E has a canonical left module structure over the ring End⁡A(E)\operatorname{End}_A(E) and the A-module and End⁡A(E)\operatorname{End}_A(E)-module structures on E are compatible.

Clearly when E is a multimodule over two families (Aλ)λ∈L,(Bμ)μ∈M(A_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}, (B_\mu)_{\mu \in M} of rings, E is also a multimodule over any two subfamilies (Aλ)λ∈L′,(Bμ)μ∈M′(A_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L'}, (B_\mu)_{\mu \in M'}, where the AλA_\lambda-module and BμB_\mu-module structures for λ∈L′\lambda \in L' and μ∈M′\mu \in M' are those initially given.

Since multimodules are particular examples of commutative groups with operators, the results of nos. 2 to 10 (cf. no. 10, Remark) can be applied to them; in particular, if E, F are two ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodules, a homomorphism u:E→Fu : E \to F is a mapping which is an AλA_\lambda-homomorphism for all λ∈L\lambda \in L and a BμB_\mu-homomorphism for all μ∈M\mu \in M. The stable subgroups of an ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodule are ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodules (called submultimodules), as also are the quotients by such subgroups (called quotient multimodules); similarly for products and direct sums.

Let E be an ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodule and for each λ∈L\lambda \in L (resp. μ∈M\mu \in M) let ϕλ:Aλ′→Aλ\phi_\lambda : A'_\lambda \to A_\lambda (resp. ψμ:Bμ′→Bμ\psi_\mu : B'_\mu \to B_\mu) be a ring homomorphism; clearly the Aλ′A'_\lambda-module structures associated with the ϕλ\phi_\lambda and the AλA_\lambda-module structures given on E and the Bμ′B'_\mu-module structures associated with the ψμ\psi_\mu and the BλB_\lambda-module structures given on E are compatible with one another and hence define on E an ((Aλ′),(Bμ′))((A'_\lambda), (B'_\mu))-multimodule structure, said to be associated with the given ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodule structure and the ϕλ\phi_\lambda and ψμ\psi_\mu.

If E, F are two ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodules, the additive group of homomorphisms of E into F is denoted by Hom⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F)\operatorname{Hom}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E, F) (or simply Hom⁡(E,F)\operatorname{Hom}(E, F)). Formulae (6) to (8) of no. 2 are obviously valid for ((Aλ),(Bμ))((A_\lambda), (B_\mu))-multimodule homomorphisms and, in particular, Hom⁡(E,E)=End⁡(E)\operatorname{Hom}(E, E) = \operatorname{End}(E) has a ring structure;

moreover Hom(E, F) has a canonical left End(F)-module structure and right End(E)-module structure, these two structures being compatible; in other words, Hom(E, F) has a canonical (End(F), End(E))-bimodule structure.

Suppose now that E has a multimodule structure whose rings of left (resp. right) operators are on the one hand the AλA_\lambda for λ∈L\lambda \in L (resp. the BμB_\mu for μ∈M\mu \in M) and on the other the rings of another family (Aλ′′)λ′∈L′(A'_{\lambda'})_{\lambda' \in L'} (resp. (Bμ′′)μ′∈M′(B'_{\mu'})_{\mu' \in M'}). Suppose similarly that F has a multimodule structure whose rings of left (resp. right) operators are on the one hand the AλA_\lambda for λ∈L\lambda \in L (resp. the BμB_\mu for μ∈M\mu \in M) and on the other the rings of another family (Aλ′′′′)λ′′∈L′′(A''_{\lambda''})_{\lambda'' \in L''} (resp. (Bμ′′′′)μ′′∈M′′(B''_{\mu''})_{\mu'' \in M''}); to abbreviate we shall say that E is an ((AλA_\lambda), (Aλ′′A'_{\lambda'}); (BμB_\mu), (Bμ′′B'_{\mu'}))-multimodule and F an ((AλA_\lambda), (Aλ′′′′A''_{\lambda''}); (BμB_\mu), (Bμ′′′′B''_{\mu''}))-multimodule. Consider E and F as ((AλA_\lambda), (BμB_\mu))-multimodules, thus restricting the operators to the subfamilies (AλA_\lambda) and (BμB_\mu). By what was said at the beginnings of this no., the multimodule structures given on E and F define canonically ring homomorphisms

Aλ′′→End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E),Bμ′′0→End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E), A'_{\lambda'} \to \operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E), \qquad {B'_{\mu'}}^0 \to \operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E),
Aλ′′′′→End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(F),Bμ′′′′→End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(F); A''_{\lambda''} \to \operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(F), \qquad B''_{\mu''} \to \operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(F);

moreover, two elements of End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E)\operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E) (resp. End⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(F)\operatorname{End}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(F)) respective images of elements of two distinct rings among the Aλ′′A'_{\lambda'}, or the Bμ′′0{B'_{\mu'}}^0 (resp. the Aλ′′′′A''_{\lambda''} or the Bμ′′′′B''_{\mu''}) are permutable; it follows that the above homomorphisms define on Hom⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F)\operatorname{Hom}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E, F) a multimodule structure whose rings of left operators are the Aλ′′′′A''_{\lambda''} (λ′′∈L′′\lambda'' \in L'') and the Bμ′′B'_{\mu'} (μ′∈M′\mu' \in M') and whose rings of right operators are the Aλ′′A'_{\lambda'} (λ′∈L′\lambda' \in L') and the Bμ′′′′B''_{\mu''} (μ′′∈M′′\mu'' \in M'').

If now E′E' is an ((AλA_\lambda), (Aλ′′A'_{\lambda'}); (BμB_\mu), (Bμ′′B'_{\mu'}))-multimodule and F′F' an ((AλA_\lambda), (Aλ′′′′A''_{\lambda''}); (BμB_\mu), (Bμ′′′′B''_{\mu''}))-multimodule, Hom⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E′,F′)\operatorname{Hom}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E', F') is an

((Aλ′′′′),(Bμ′′);(Aλ′′),(Bμ′′′′))-multimodule; ((A''_{\lambda''}), (B'_{\mu'}); (A'_{\lambda'}), (B''_{\mu''}))\text{-multimodule};

if u:E′→E,v:F→F′u : E' \to E, v : F \to F' are multimodule homomorphisms,

Hom⁡(u,v):Hom⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F)→Hom⁡(Aλ),(Bμ)(E′,F′) \operatorname{Hom}(u, v) : \operatorname{Hom}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E, F) \to \operatorname{Hom}_{(A_\lambda), (B_\mu)}(E', F')

is defined as in no. 2 and is a multimodule homomorphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.