(1) On a ring A the module structures of As and Ad are compatible and A can therefore be considered canonically as an (A, A)-bimodule.
(2) A left A-module E has a canonical left module structure over the ring EndA(E) and the A-module and EndA(E)-module structures on E are compatible.
Clearly when E is a multimodule over two families (Aλ)λ∈L,(Bμ)μ∈M of rings, E is also a multimodule over any two subfamilies (Aλ)λ∈L′,(Bμ)μ∈M′, where the Aλ-module and Bμ-module structures for λ∈L′ and μ∈M′ are those initially given.
Since multimodules are particular examples of commutative groups with operators, the results of nos. 2 to 10 (cf. no. 10, Remark) can be applied to them; in particular, if E, F are two ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodules, a homomorphism u:E→F is a mapping which is an Aλ-homomorphism for all λ∈L and a Bμ-homomorphism for all μ∈M. The stable subgroups of an ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodule are ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodules (called submultimodules), as also are the quotients by such subgroups (called quotient multimodules); similarly for products and direct sums.
Let E be an ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodule and for each λ∈L (resp. μ∈M) let ϕλ:Aλ′→Aλ (resp. ψμ:Bμ′→Bμ) be a ring homomorphism; clearly the Aλ′-module structures associated with the ϕλ and the Aλ-module structures given on E and the Bμ′-module structures associated with the ψμ and the Bλ-module structures given on E are compatible with one another and hence define on E an ((Aλ′),(Bμ′))-multimodule structure, said to be associated with the given ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodule structure and the ϕλ and ψμ.
If E, F are two ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodules, the additive group of homomorphisms of E into F is denoted by Hom(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F) (or simply Hom(E,F)). Formulae (6) to (8) of no. 2 are obviously valid for ((Aλ),(Bμ))-multimodule homomorphisms and, in particular, Hom(E,E)=End(E) has a ring structure;
moreover Hom(E, F) has a canonical left End(F)-module structure and right End(E)-module structure, these two structures being compatible; in other words, Hom(E, F) has a canonical (End(F), End(E))-bimodule structure.
Suppose now that E has a multimodule structure whose rings of left (resp. right) operators are on the one hand the Aλ for λ∈L (resp. the Bμ for μ∈M) and on the other the rings of another family (Aλ′′)λ′∈L′ (resp. (Bμ′′)μ′∈M′). Suppose similarly that F has a multimodule structure whose rings of left (resp. right) operators are on the one hand the Aλ for λ∈L (resp. the Bμ for μ∈M) and on the other the rings of another family (Aλ′′′′)λ′′∈L′′ (resp. (Bμ′′′′)μ′′∈M′′); to abbreviate we shall say that E is an ((Aλ), (Aλ′′); (Bμ), (Bμ′′))-multimodule and F an ((Aλ), (Aλ′′′′); (Bμ), (Bμ′′′′))-multimodule. Consider E and F as ((Aλ), (Bμ))-multimodules, thus restricting the operators to the subfamilies (Aλ) and (Bμ). By what was said at the beginnings of this no., the multimodule structures given on E and F define canonically ring homomorphisms
Aλ′′→End(Aλ),(Bμ)(E),Bμ′′0→End(Aλ),(Bμ)(E),
Aλ′′′′→End(Aλ),(Bμ)(F),Bμ′′′′→End(Aλ),(Bμ)(F);
moreover, two elements of End(Aλ),(Bμ)(E) (resp. End(Aλ),(Bμ)(F)) respective images of elements of two distinct rings among the Aλ′′, or the Bμ′′0 (resp. the Aλ′′′′ or the Bμ′′′′) are permutable; it follows that the above homomorphisms define on Hom(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F) a multimodule structure whose rings of left operators are the Aλ′′′′ (λ′′∈L′′) and the Bμ′′ (μ′∈M′) and whose rings of right operators are the Aλ′′ (λ′∈L′) and the Bμ′′′′ (μ′′∈M′′).
If now E′ is an ((Aλ), (Aλ′′); (Bμ), (Bμ′′))-multimodule and F′ an ((Aλ), (Aλ′′′′); (Bμ), (Bμ′′′′))-multimodule, Hom(Aλ),(Bμ)(E′,F′) is an
((Aλ′′′′),(Bμ′′);(Aλ′′),(Bμ′′′′))-multimodule;
if u:E′→E,v:F→F′ are multimodule homomorphisms,
Hom(u,v):Hom(Aλ),(Bμ)(E,F)→Hom(Aλ),(Bμ)(E′,F′)
is defined as in no. 2 and is a multimodule homomorphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.