Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 05MW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05MW].

Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality

For an A-linear mapping u:E→Fu : E \to F to be surjective (resp. bijective, resp. zero), it is necessary and sufficient that, for every A-module G, the mapping Hom⁡(u,1G):Hom⁡(F,G)→Hom⁡(E,G)\operatorname{Hom}(u, 1_G) : \operatorname{Hom}(F, G) \to \operatorname{Hom}(E, G) be injective (resp. bijective, resp. zero).

It suffices to apply Theorem 1 to the case where E′′={0}E'' = \{0\} (resp. E′={0}E' = \{0\} resp. E′′=EE'' = E and v=1Ev = 1_E).

Note that starting from an exact sequence

0⟶E′→uE→vE′′⟶0 0 \longrightarrow E' \xrightarrow{u} E \xrightarrow{v} E'' \longrightarrow 0

the corresponding sequence

0⟶Hom⁡(E′′,F)→vˉHom⁡(E,F)→uˉHom⁡(E′,F)⟶0 0 \longrightarrow \operatorname{Hom}(E'', F) \xrightarrow{\bar{v}} \operatorname{Hom}(E, F) \xrightarrow{\bar{u}} \operatorname{Hom}(E', F) \longrightarrow 0

is not necessarily exact, in other words, the homomorphism uˉ\bar{u} is not necessarily surjective. If E′E' is identified with a submodule of E, this means that a linear mapping of E′E' into F cannot always be extended to a linear mapping of E into F (Exercises 11 and 12). However:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.