Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 05MV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05MV].

Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality

Let A be a ring, E', E, E'' three A-modules and u : E' \to E, v : E \to E'' two homomorphisms. For the sequence

(1)E′→uE→vE′′⟶0 \text{(1)} \quad E' \xrightarrow{u} E \xrightarrow{v} E'' \longrightarrow 0

to be exact, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every A-module F, the sequence

(2)0⟶Hom(E′′,F)→vˉHom(E,F)→uˉHom(E′,F) \text{(2)} \quad 0 \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}(E'', F) \xrightarrow{\bar{v}} \mathrm{Hom}(E, F) \xrightarrow{\bar{u}} \mathrm{Hom}(E', F)

(where uˉ=Hom(u,1F)\bar{u} = \mathrm{Hom}(u, 1_F), vˉ=Hom(v,1F)\bar{v} = \mathrm{Hom}(v, 1_F)) be exact.

Suppose that sequence (1) is exact. If w∈Hom(E′′,F)w \in \mathrm{Hom}(E'', F) and vˉ(w)=w∘v=0\bar{v}(w) = w \circ v = 0, then w=0w = 0 since vv is surjective. Sequence (2) is therefore exact at Hom(E′′,F)\mathrm{Hom}(E'', F). We show that it is exact at Hom(E,F)\mathrm{Hom}(E, F). uˉ∘vˉ=Hom(v∘u,1F)\bar{u} \circ \bar{v} = \mathrm{Hom}(v \circ u, 1_F) (§ 1, no. 2, formula (10)) and v∘u=0v \circ u = 0 since sequence (1) is exact at E. Therefore uˉ∘vˉ=0\bar{u} \circ \bar{v} = 0, that is Im(vˉ)⊂Ker(uˉ)\mathrm{Im}(\bar{v}) \subset \mathrm{Ker}(\bar{u}). On the other hand, if w∈Ker(uˉ)w \in \mathrm{Ker}(\bar{u}), then w∘u=0w \circ u = 0 and hence Ker(w)⊃Im(u)\mathrm{Ker}(w) \supset \mathrm{Im}(u). But as sequence (1) is exact at E, Im(u)=Ker(v)\mathrm{Im}(u) = \mathrm{Ker}(v) and hence Ker(w)⊃Ker(v)\mathrm{Ker}(w) \supset \mathrm{Ker}(v); as vv is surjective, it follows from § 1, no. 3, Remark that there exists a w′∈Hom(E′′,F)w' \in \mathrm{Hom}(E'', F) such that w = w' \circ v = \bar{v}(w'). Therefore Ker(\bar{u}) \subset \operatorname{Im}(\bar{v}), which completes the proof that sequence (2) is exact.

Conversely, suppose that (2) is exact for every A-module F. As uˉ∘vˉ=Hom⁡(v∘u,1F)=0,w∘v∘u=0\bar{u} \circ \bar{v} = \operatorname{Hom}(v \circ u, 1_F) = 0, w \circ v \circ u = 0 for every homomorphism w:E′′→Fw : E'' \to F. Taking F=E′′F = E'' and w=1E′′w = 1_{E''}, it is seen first that v∘u=0v \circ u = 0 and hence u(E′)⊂Ker⁡(v)u(E') \subset \operatorname{Ker}(v). Now take F=Coker⁡(u)F = \operatorname{Coker}(u) and let ϕ:E→F=E/u(E′)\phi : E \to F = E/u(E') be the canonical mapping. Then uˉ(ϕ)=ϕ∘u=0\bar{u}(\phi) = \phi \circ u = 0 by definition and hence there exists a ψ∈Hom⁡(E′′,F)\psi \in \operatorname{Hom}(E'', F) such that ϕ=vˉ(ψ)=ψ∘v\phi = \bar{v}(\psi) = \psi \circ v; this obviously implies u(E′)=Ker⁡(ϕ)⊃Ker⁡(v)u(E') = \operatorname{Ker}(\phi) \supset \operatorname{Ker}(v), which proves that sequence (1) is exact at E. Finally, let θ\theta be the canonical homomorphism of E′′E'' onto F=E′′/v(E)F = E''/v(E); then vˉ(θ)=θ∘v=0\bar{v}(\theta) = \theta \circ v = 0, hence θ=0\theta = 0; therefore, F={0}F = \{0\} and vv is surjective. Sequence (1) is therefore exact at E′′E''.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.