Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 0436, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0436].

Commutative Algebra, chapter I, § 2. Flat modules

Let A,BA, B be two rings, EE a right AA-module, FF a right BB-module and GG a (B,A)(B, A)-bimodule. Suppose that FF is flat. Then, if EE is finitely generated (resp. finitely presented), the canonical homomorphism (8) is injective (resp. bijective).

Consider A,B,F,GA, B, F, G as fixed and for each right AA-module EE set

T(E)=F⊗BHom⁡A(E,G),T′(E)=Hom⁡A(E,F⊗BG) T(E) = F \otimes_B \operatorname{Hom}_A(E, G), \quad T'(E) = \operatorname{Hom}_A(E, F \otimes_B G)

and denote the homomorphism (8) by νE\nu_E; for every right AA-module homomorphism v:E→E′v : E \to E', set T(v)=1,⊗Hom⁡(v,1G)T(v) = 1, \otimes \operatorname{Hom}(v, 1_G) and T′(v)=Hom⁡(v,1,⊗1G)T'(v) = \operatorname{Hom}(v, 1, \otimes 1_G). Let L,→vL0→wE→0L, \xrightarrow{v} L_0 \xrightarrow{w} E \to 0 be a presentation of EE; we suppose the free module L0L_0 (resp. the free modules L0L_0 and L1L_1) to be finitely generated. The diagram

0⟶T(E)→T(w)T(L0)→T(v)T(L1)↓νE↓νL0↓νL10⟶T′(E)→T′(w)T′(L0)→T′(v)T′(L1) \begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \longrightarrow & T(E) & \xrightarrow{T(w)} & T(L_0) & \xrightarrow{T(v)} & T(L_1) \\ & & \downarrow{\nu_E} & & \downarrow{\nu_{L_0}} & & \downarrow{\nu_{L_1}} \\ 0 & \longrightarrow & T'(E) & \xrightarrow{T'(w)} & T'(L_0) & \xrightarrow{T'(v)} & T'(L_1) \end{array}

is commutative and the second row is exact (Algebra, Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1); moreover, the sequence

0→Hom⁡A(E,G)→Hom⁡A(L0,G)→Hom⁡A(L1,G) 0 \to \operatorname{Hom}_A(E, G) \to \operatorname{Hom}_A(L_0, G) \to \operatorname{Hom}_A(L_1, G)

is exact (loc. cit.), and as FF is flat, the first row of (9) is also an exact sequence (no. 3, Proposition 1). Then we know that νL0\nu_{L_0} (resp. νL0\nu_{L_0} and νL1\nu_{L_1}) is bijective (resp. are bijective) (Algebra, Chapter II, § 4, no. 2, Proposition 2). If we assume only that νL0\nu_{L_0} is bijective, it follows from (9) that

νL0∘T(w)=T′(w)∘νE \nu_{L_0} \circ T(w) = T'(w) \circ \nu_E

is injective and hence so is νE\nu_E. If we assume that both νL0\nu_{L_0} and νL1\nu_{L_1} are bijective, it follows from § 1, no. 4, Corollary 2, (ii) to Proposition 2 that νE\nu_E is surjective, and as we have just seen that νE\nu_E is injective, it is bijective.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.