Bourbaki

Proposition 20

Tag 0678, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0678].

Algebra, chapter III, § 10. Derivations

Suppose that A′=A⊗KK′A' = A \otimes_K K', with η′:K′→A′\eta': K' \to A' and u:A→A′u: A \to A' the canonical homomorphisms. Then the A′A'-linear mapping

Ω0(u):ΩK(A)⊗AA′→ΩK′(A′) \Omega_0(u): \Omega_K(A) \otimes_A A' \to \Omega_{K'}(A')

is an isomorphism.

By virtue of the fact that in diagram (42) the vertical arrows are bijective, it reduces to proving that, for every A′A'-module E′E', the homomorphism C(u):D↦D∘uC(u): D \mapsto D \circ u in diagram (42) is bijective (II, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). Now Hom(u,1E′):HomK′(A⊗KK′,E′)→HomK(A,E′)\mathrm{Hom}(u, 1_{E'}): \mathrm{Hom}_{K'}(A \otimes_K K', E') \to \mathrm{Hom}_K(A, E') is an isomorphism (II, § 5, no. 1, Proposition 1) and C(u)C(u) is its restriction to DK′(A′,E′)D_{K'}(A', E') and hence is injective; moreover, if f:A′→E′f: A' \to E' is a K′K'-linear mapping such that

f∘u:A→E′ f \circ u: A \to E'

is a KK-derivation, it follows immediately from the fact that ff is K′K'-linear and the fact that f((x⊗1)(y⊗1))=(y⊗1)f(x⊗1)+(x⊗1)f(y⊗1)f((x \otimes 1)(y \otimes 1)) = (y \otimes 1)f(x \otimes 1) + (x \otimes 1)f(y \otimes 1) for x,yx, y in AA, that ff is a K′K'-*derivation*, the elements x⊗1x \otimes 1 for x∈Ax \in A forming a generating system of the K′K'-module A′A'; this completes the proof that C(u)C(u) is bijective.

From now on we confine our attention to the case where ρ:K→K′\rho: K \to K' is the identity mapping of KK; every KK-algebra homomorphism u:A→Bu: A \to B is therefore mapped to a BB-linear mapping

Ω0(u):ΩK(A)⊗KB→ΩK(B). \Omega_0(u): \Omega_K(A) \otimes_K B \to \Omega_K(B).

On the other hand, we can consider the BB-module of AA-*differentials* ΩA(B)\Omega_A(B) since BB is an AA-algebra by means of uu; the canonical derivation dB/A:B→ΩA(B)d_{B/A}: B \to \Omega_A(B) being a fortiori a KK-derivation, it factorizes uniquely into

B→dB/KΩK(B)→ΩuΩA(B) B \xrightarrow{d_{B/K}} \Omega_K(B) \xrightarrow{\Omega_u} \Omega_A(B)

where Ωu\Omega_u is a BB-linear mapping (no. 11, Proposition 18). For every BB-module EE, there is a commutative diagram

HomB(ΩA(B),E)→Hom(Ωu,1E)HomB(ΩK(B),E)↓ϕA,B↓ϕK,BDA(B,E)→juDK(B,E) \begin{array}{ccc} \mathrm{Hom}_B(\Omega_A(B), E) & \xrightarrow{\mathrm{Hom}(\Omega_u, 1_E)} & \mathrm{Hom}_B(\Omega_K(B), E) \\ \downarrow \phi_{A,B} & & \downarrow \phi_{K,B} \\ D_A(B, E) & \xrightarrow{j_u} & D_K(B, E) \end{array}

where juj_u is the canonical injection (no. 7); this follows immediately from Proposition 18 of no. 11.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.