Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 062E, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 062E].

Algebra, chapter III, § 6. Symmetric algebras

Let A be a commutative ring and M and N two A-modules. If with every A-linear mapping g:Sn(M)→Ng : S^n(M) \to N (n⩾1n \geqslant 1) is associated the n-linear mapping

(x1,x2,…,xn)↦g(x1x2…xn) (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto g(x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n)

(where on the right-hand side the product is taken in the algebra S(M)S(M)), a bijective A-linear mapping is obtained of the A-module Hom⁡A(Sn(M),N)\operatorname{Hom}_A(S^n(M), N) onto the A-module of symmetric n-linear mappings of MnM^n into N.

Recall (II, § 3, no. 9) that there is a canonical bijection of the A-module Hom⁡A(Tn(M),N)\operatorname{Hom}_A(T^n(M), N) onto the A-module Ln(M,…,M;N)\mathscr{L}_n(M, \ldots, M; N) of all n-linear mappings of MnM^n into N obtained by associating with every A-linear mapping f:Tn(M)→Nf : T^n(M) \to N the n-linear mapping

f~:(x1,x2,…,xn)↦f(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn). \tilde{f} : (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto f(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n).

On the other hand, the A-linear mappings g:Sn(M)→Ng : S^n(M) \to N are in one-to-one correspondence with the A-linear mappings f:Tn(M)→Nf : T^n(M) \to N such that ff is zero on Jn′\mathfrak{J}'_n, by associating with gg the mapping f=g∘pnf = g \circ p_n, where

pn:Tn(M)→Sn(M)=Tn(M)/Jn′ p_n : T^n(M) \to S^n(M) = T^n(M)/\mathfrak{J}'_n

is the canonical homomorphism (II, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). But as Jn′\mathfrak{J}'_n is a linear combination of elements of the form

(u1⊗u2⊗⋯⊗up)⊗(x⊗y−y⊗x)⊗(v1⊗⋯⊗vn−p−2) (u_1 \otimes u_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes u_p) \otimes (x \otimes y - y \otimes x) \otimes (v_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes v_{n-p-2})

n-th symmetric power

(x, y, u_i, v_j in M), to say that the function f is of the form g \circ p_n means that the corresponding n-linear function fˉ\bar{f} satisfies the relation

fˉ(u1,…,up,x,y,v1,…,vn−p−2)=fˉ(u1,…,up,y,x,v1,…,vn−p−2); \bar{f}(u_1, \ldots, u_p, x, y, v_1, \ldots, v_{n-p-2}) = \bar{f}(u_1, \ldots, u_p, y, x, v_1, \ldots, v_{n-p-2});

in other words, by what has been seen above, this means that fˉ\bar{f} is symmetric; whence the proposition, taking account of the fact that

pn(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn)=x1x2…xn p_n(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n) = x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n

with the xi∈Mx_i \in M.

The A-module Sn(M)S^n(M) is called the n-th symmetric power of M. For every A-module homomorphism u:M→Nu : M \to N, the mapping Sn(u):Sn(M)→Sn(N)S^n(u) : S^n(M) \to S^n(N) which coincides with S(u)S(u) on Sn(M)S^n(M) is called the n-th symmetric power of u.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.