Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 05MY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05MY].

Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality

Let AA be a ring, F′,F,F′′F', F, F'' three AA-modules and u:F′→F,v:F→F′′u: F' \to F, v: F \to F'' two homomorphisms. For the sequence

0⟶F′→vF→uF′′ 0 \longrightarrow F' \xrightarrow{v} F \xrightarrow{u} F''

to be exact, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every AA-module EE, the sequence

0⟶Hom(E,F′)→uˉHom(E,F)→vˉHom(E,F′′) 0 \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}(E, F') \xrightarrow{\bar{u}} \mathrm{Hom}(E, F) \xrightarrow{\bar{v}} \mathrm{Hom}(E, F'')

(where uˉ=Hom(1E,u),vˉ=Hom(1E,v)\bar{u} = \mathrm{Hom}(1_E, u), \bar{v} = \mathrm{Hom}(1_E, v)) be exact.

Suppose that the sequence (5) is exact. Note first that

vˉ∘uˉ=Hom(1E,v∘u)=0 \bar{v} \circ \bar{u} = \mathrm{Hom}(1_E, v \circ u) = 0

(II, §1§ 1, no. 2, formula (10)) since v∘u=0v \circ u = 0. The image of Hom(E,F′)\mathrm{Hom}(E, F') under uˉ\bar{u} is therefore contained in the kernel NN of vˉ\bar{v}; let ff be the homomorphism of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module Hom(E,F′)\mathrm{Hom}(E, F') into NN whose graph is equal to that of uˉ\bar{u}; it is necessary to prove that ff is bijective and hence to define a mapping g:N→Hom(E,F′)g: N \to \mathrm{Hom}(E, F') such that f∘gf \circ g and g∘fg \circ f are the identity mappings. For this, let ww be an element of NN, that is a linear mapping w:E→Fw: E \to F such that v∘w=0v \circ w = 0. The latter relation is equivalent to w(E)⊂Ker(v)=u(F′)w(E) \subset \mathrm{Ker}(v) = u(F') by hypothesis, hence, since uu is injective, there exists one and only one linear mapping w′:E→F′w': E \to F' such that w=u∘w′w = u \circ w' and we take g(w)=w′g(w) = w'; it is immediately verified that gg satisfies the desired conditions.

Conversely, suppose that sequence (6) is exact for every AA-module EE. As Hom(1E,v∘u)=vˉ∘uˉ=0\mathrm{Hom}(1_E, v \circ u) = \bar{v} \circ \bar{u} = 0, then v∘u∘w=0v \circ u \circ w = 0 for every homomorphism w:E→F′w: E \to F'. Taking E=F′E = F' and w=1F′w = 1_{F'}, it is seen first that v∘u=0v \circ u = 0 and hence u(F′)⊂Ker(v)u(F') \subset \mathrm{Ker}(v). Now we take E=Ker(v)E = \mathrm{Ker}(v) and let ϕ:E→F\phi: E \to F be the canonical injection. Then vˉ(ϕ)=v∘ϕ=0\bar{v}(\phi) = v \circ \phi = 0 by definition and hence there exists ψ∈Hom(E,F′)\psi \in \mathrm{Hom}(E, F') such that ϕ=uˉ(ψ)=u∘ψ\phi = \bar{u}(\psi) = u \circ \psi, which obviously implies Ker(v)⊂u(F′)\mathrm{Ker}(v) \subset u(F') and completes the proof of the exactness of (5) at FF. Finally, if θ\theta is the identity mapping of Ker u\mathrm{Ker}\, u, then uˉ(θ)=0\bar{u}(\theta) = 0, hence θ=0\theta = 0 and Ker u={0}\mathrm{Ker}\, u = \{0\}, which proves the exactness of (5) at F′F'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.