On the vector space (with respect to the field R) of continuous real-valued functions on an interval [a,b] of R, the mapping x↦∫abx(t)dt is a linear form.
Let E be a left A-module and E∗ its dual; for every ordered pair of elements x∈E,x∗∈E∗, the element x∗(x) of A is denoted by ⟨x,x∗⟩. Then the relations
(9)(10)(11)(12)⟨x+y,x∗⟩=⟨x,x∗⟩+⟨y,x∗⟩⟨x,x∗+y∗⟩=⟨x,x∗⟩+⟨x,y∗⟩⟨αx,x∗⟩=α⟨x,x∗⟩⟨x,x∗α⟩=⟨x,x∗⟩α
hold for x,y in E,x∗,y∗ in E∗ and α∈A. The mapping (x,x∗)↦⟨x,x∗⟩ of E×E∗ into A is called the canonical bilinear form on E×E∗ (the notion of bilinear form will be defined generally in IX, § 1). Every linear form x∗ on E can be considered as the partial mapping x↦⟨x,x∗⟩ corresponding to the canonical bilinear form.
When E is a right A-module, the value x∗(x) of a linear form x∗∈E∗ at an element x∈E is denoted by ⟨x∗,x⟩ and the formulae corresponding to (11) and (12) are written as
⟨x∗,xα⟩⟨αx∗,x⟩=⟨x∗,x⟩α=α⟨x∗,x⟩.
When A is commutative, either notation is permissible.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.