Bourbaki

Definition 5

Tag 05NF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05NF].

Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality

For every linear mapping u of an A-module E into an A-module F, the linear mapping y* ↦ y* ∘ u of the dual F* of F into the dual E* of E is called the transpose of u and is denoted by t u.

The transpose tu^t u is therefore defined by the relation (15)

⟨u(x),y∗⟩=⟨x,tu(y∗)⟩for all x∈E and all y∗∈F∗. \langle u(x), y^* \rangle = \langle x, ^t u(y^*) \rangle \quad \text{for all } x \in E \text{ and all } y^* \in F^*.

Definition 5 applies without alteration to right A-modules and is then equivalent to the relation

⟨y∗,u(x)⟩=⟨tu(y∗),x⟩for all x∈E and all y∗∈F∗. \langle y^*, u(x) \rangle = \langle ^t u(y^*), x \rangle \quad \text{for all } x \in E \text{ and all } y^* \in F^*.

Formulae (9) and (10) of § 1, no. 2 here give (16)

t(u1+u2)=tu1+tu2 ^t(u_1 + u_2) = ^t u_1 + ^t u_2
for two elements u1,u2u_1, u_2 of HomA(E,F)\mathrm{Hom}_A(E, F) and (17)
t(v∘u)=tu∘tv ^t(v \circ u) = ^t u \circ ^t v
for u∈HomA(E,F)u \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(E, F) and v∈HomA(F,G)v \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(F, G), G being a third A-module; finally, clearly (18)
t1E=1E∗. ^t 1_E = 1_{E^*}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.