Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 062F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 062F].

Algebra, chapter III, § 6. Symmetric algebras

Let σ\sigma be a permutation in Sn\mathfrak{S}_n; as the mapping

(x1,x2,…,xn)↦xσ−1(1)⊗xσ−1(2)⊗⋯⊗xσ−1(n) (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto x_{\sigma^{-1}(1)} \otimes x_{\sigma^{-1}(2)} \otimes \cdots \otimes x_{\sigma^{-1}(n)}

of MnM^n into Tn(M)T^n(M) is A-multilinear, it may be written uniquely as

(x1,…,xn)↦uσ(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn), (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto u_\sigma(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n),

where uσu_\sigma is an endomorphism of the A-module Tn(M)T^n(M), also denoted by z↦σ.zz \mapsto \sigma . z. Clearly, if σ\sigma is the identity element of Sn\mathfrak{S}_n, uσu_\sigma is the identity; on the other hand, writing yi=xσ−1(i)y_i = x_{\sigma^{-1}(i)}, we obtain, for every permutation τ∈Sn,yτ−1(i)=xσ−1(τ−1(i))\tau \in \mathfrak{S}_n, y_{\tau^{-1}(i)} = x_{\sigma^{-1}(\tau^{-1}(i))} and hence τ.(σ.z)=(τσ).z\tau . (\sigma . z) = (\tau \sigma) . z; in other words, the A-module Tn(M)T^n(M) is a left Sn\mathfrak{S}_n-*set* under the operation (σ,z)↦σ.z(\sigma, z) \mapsto \sigma . z (I, § 5, no. 1). The elements of Tn(M)T^n(M) such that σ.z=z\sigma . z = z for all σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n are called (contravariant) symmetric tensors of order n; they form a sub-A-module Sn′(M)S'_n(M) of Tn(M)T^n(M).

For all z∈Tn(M)z \in T^n(M), we write s.z=∑σ∈Snσ.zs . z = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n} \sigma . z and call s.zs . z the symmetrization of the tensor zz; clearly s.zs . z is a symmetric tensor and therefore z↦s.zz \mapsto s . z is an endomorphism of Tn(M)T^n(M) whose image Sn′′(M)S''_n(M) is contained in Sn′(M)S'_n(M); in general, Sn′′(M)≠Sn′(M)S''_n(M) \neq S'_n(M) (Exercise 5). If zz is a symmetric tensor, then s.z=n!zs . z = n! z; it follows that when n! is invertible in A, the endomorphism z↦(n!)−1s.zz \mapsto (n!)^{-1} s . z is a projector of Tn(M)T^n(M) (II, § 1, no. 8), whose image is Sn′(M)=Sn′′(M)S'_n(M) = S''_n(M); moreover the kernel on this projector is just Jn′\mathfrak{J}'_n. For, obviously σ(Jn′)⊂Jn′\sigma(\mathfrak{J}'_n) \subset \mathfrak{J}'_n for all σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n and Jn′\mathfrak{J}'_n is by definition generated by the tensors z−ρ.zz - \rho . z, where ρ\rho is a transposition exchanging two consecutive numbers in {1,n}\{1, n\}; also, if σ,τ\sigma, \tau are two permutations in Sn\mathfrak{S}_n, then z−(στ).z=z−σ.z+σ.(z−τ.z)z - (\sigma \tau) . z = z - \sigma . z + \sigma . (z - \tau . z), whence it follows (since every permutation in Sn\mathfrak{S}_n is a product of transpositions exchanging two consecutive numbers) that z−σ.z∈Jn′z - \sigma . z \in \mathfrak{J}'_n for all z∈Tn(M)z \in T^n(M) and σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n. Therefore (always supposing that n! is invertible in A), it is seen that

z−(n!)−1s.z=∑σ∈Sn(n!)−1(z−σ.z)∈Jn′ z - (n!)^{-1} s . z = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n} (n!)^{-1} (z - \sigma . z) \in \mathfrak{J}'_n

for all z∈Tn(M)z \in T^n(M), which proves our assertion.

When n!n! is invertible in AA, the submodules Sn′(M)S'_n(M) and gn′\mathfrak{g}'_n of Tn(M)T^n(M) are therefore supplementary and the restriction to Sn′(M)S'_n(M) of the canonical homomorphism Tn(M)→Sn(M)=Tn(M)/gn′T^n(M) \to S^n(M) = T^n(M)/\mathfrak{g}'_n is an AA-module isomorphism, which allows us in the case envisaged to identify symmetric tensors of order nn with the elements of the nn-th symmetric power of MM. Note however that this identification is not compatible with multiplication, the product (in T(M)T(M)) of two symmetric tensors not being symmetric in general and not therefore having as image in S(M)S(M) the product of the images of the symmetric tensors considered.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.