Remark
Tag 062F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 062F].
Algebra, chapter III, § 6. Symmetric algebras
Let be a permutation in ; as the mapping
of into is A-multilinear, it may be written uniquely as
where is an endomorphism of the A-module , also denoted by . Clearly, if is the identity element of , is the identity; on the other hand, writing , we obtain, for every permutation and hence ; in other words, the A-module is a left -*set* under the operation (I, § 5, no. 1). The elements of such that for all are called (contravariant) symmetric tensors of order n; they form a sub-A-module of .
For all , we write and call the symmetrization of the tensor ; clearly is a symmetric tensor and therefore is an endomorphism of whose image is contained in ; in general, (Exercise 5). If is a symmetric tensor, then ; it follows that when n! is invertible in A, the endomorphism is a projector of (II, § 1, no. 8), whose image is ; moreover the kernel on this projector is just . For, obviously for all and is by definition generated by the tensors , where is a transposition exchanging two consecutive numbers in ; also, if are two permutations in , then , whence it follows (since every permutation in is a product of transpositions exchanging two consecutive numbers) that for all and . Therefore (always supposing that n! is invertible in A), it is seen that
for all , which proves our assertion.
When is invertible in , the submodules and of are therefore supplementary and the restriction to of the canonical homomorphism is an -module isomorphism, which allows us in the case envisaged to identify symmetric tensors of order with the elements of the -th symmetric power of . Note however that this identification is not compatible with multiplication, the product (in ) of two symmetric tensors not being symmetric in general and not therefore having as image in the product of the images of the symmetric tensors considered.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.