Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0643, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0643].

Algebra, chapter III, § 8. Determinants

(i) If uu and vv are two endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional free AA-module MM, then

(2)

det⁡(u∘v)=(det⁡u)(det⁡v). \det(u \circ v) = (\det u)(\det v).

(ii) det⁡(1M)=1\det(1_M) = 1; for every automorphism uu of MM, det⁡u\det u is invertible in AA and

(3)

det⁡(u−1)=(det⁡u)−1. \det(u^{-1}) = (\det u)^{-1}.

If nn is the dimension of MM, this follows immediately from the relation ⋀n(u∘v)=(⋀n(u))∘(⋀n(v))\bigwedge^n(u \circ v) = (\bigwedge^n(u)) \circ (\bigwedge^n(v)) § 7, no. 2, formula (3)).

Let MM be a free AA-module with a finite basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n}; given a sequence (xi)1≤i≤n(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of nn elements of MM, the determinant of this sequence with respect to the given basis (ei)(e_i), denoted by det⁡(x1,x2,…,xn)\det(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) when no confusion can arise over the basis, is the determinant of the endomorphism uu of MM such that u(ei)=xiu(e_i) = x_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n. Then by formula (1)

x1∧x2∧⋯∧xn=det⁡(x1,x2,…,xn) e1∧e2∧⋯∧en x_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_n = \det(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \ e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n

and this relation characterizes the mapping (xi)↦det⁡(x1,x2,…,xn)(x_i) \mapsto \det(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) of MnM^n into AA. It shows that this mapping is an alternating n-linear form. As, by virtue of § 7, no. 4, Proposition 7, the AA-module of alternating nn-linear forms is canonically isomorphic to the dual of ⋀n(M)\bigwedge^n(M) and ⋀n(M)\bigwedge^n(M) is isomorphic to AA, it is seen that every alternating n-linear form on MnM^n can be written

(x1,…,xn)↦αdet⁡(x1,x2,…,xn)(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto \alpha \det(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)

for some α∈A\alpha \in A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.