Bourbaki

Proposition 18

Tag 064Y, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 064Y].

Algebra, chapter III, § 8. Determinants

The sequence of A[X]A[X]-homomorphisms

M[X]→ψM[X]→ϕMu⟶0 M[X] \xrightarrow{\psi} M[X] \xrightarrow{\phi} M_u \longrightarrow 0
is exact.

As ϕ(1⊗x)=x\phi(1 \otimes x) = x for all x∈Mx \in M, clearly ϕ\phi is surjective; on the other hand,

ϕ(X(p⊗x))=X.ϕ(p⊗x)=u(ϕ(p⊗x)), \phi(X(p \otimes x)) = X.\phi(p \otimes x) = u(\phi(p \otimes x)),
in other words, ϕ∘X=u∘ϕ=ϕ∘uˉ\phi \circ X = u \circ \phi = \phi \circ \bar{u} by (46); this proves that ϕ∘ψ=0\phi \circ \psi = 0. It remains to verify that Ker⁡ϕ⊂Im⁡ψ\operatorname{Ker} \phi \subset \operatorname{Im} \psi. For this note that, since the monomials XkX^k (k≥0k \geq 0) form a basis of the AA-module A[X]A[X], every element z∈M[X]z \in M[X] can be written uniquely in the form z=∑kXk⊗xkz = \sum_k X^k \otimes x_k, where (xk)(x_k) is a family of elements of MM, of finite support. If z∈Ker⁡ϕz \in \operatorname{Ker} \phi, then ϕ(z)=∑kuk(xk)=0\phi(z) = \sum_k u^k(x_k) = 0 and we can write
z=∑k(Xk⊗xk−1⊗uk(xk))=∑k(Xk−uˉk)(1⊗xk). z = \sum_k (X^k \otimes x_k - 1 \otimes u^k(x_k)) = \sum_k (X^k - \bar{u}^k)(1 \otimes x_k).
But as the A[X]A[X]-endomorphisms XX and uˉ\bar{u} of M[X]M[X] are permutable, then

Xk−uˉk=(X−uˉ)∘(∑j=0k−1Xjuˉk−j−1) X^k - \bar{u}^k = (X - \bar{u}) \circ \left( \sum_{j=0}^{k-1} X^j \bar{u}^{k-j-1} \right)

which proves that there exists a y∈M[X]y \in M[X] such that z=ψ(y)z = \psi(y).

Now let M′M' be another AA-module and u′u' an endomorphism of M′M'; let Mu′′M'_{u'}, ϕ′\phi', uˉ′\bar{u}', ψ′\psi' be the module and mapping obtained from M′M' and u′u' as MuM_u, ϕ\phi, uˉ\bar{u}, ψ\psi are obtained from MM and uu. Then:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.