As ϕ(1⊗x)=x for all x∈M, clearly ϕ is surjective; on the other hand,
ϕ(X(p⊗x))=X.ϕ(p⊗x)=u(ϕ(p⊗x)),
in other words, ϕ∘X=u∘ϕ=ϕ∘uˉ by (46); this proves that ϕ∘ψ=0. It remains to verify that Kerϕ⊂Imψ. For this note that, since the monomials Xk (k≥0) form a basis of the A-module A[X], every element z∈M[X] can be written uniquely in the form z=∑kXk⊗xk, where (xk) is a family of elements of M, of finite support. If z∈Kerϕ, then ϕ(z)=∑kuk(xk)=0 and we can write
z=k∑(Xk⊗xk−1⊗uk(xk))=k∑(Xk−uˉk)(1⊗xk).
But as the A[X]-endomorphisms X and uˉ of M[X] are permutable, then
Xk−uˉk=(X−uˉ)∘(j=0∑k−1Xjuˉk−j−1)
which proves that there exists a y∈M[X] such that z=ψ(y).
Now let M′ be another A-module and u′ an endomorphism of M′; let Mu′′, ϕ′, uˉ′, ψ′ be the module and mapping obtained from M′ and u′ as Mu, ϕ, uˉ, ψ are obtained from M and u. Then:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.