Bourbaki

Example

Tag 067L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 067L].

Algebra, chapter III, § 11. Cogebras, products of multilinear forms, inner products and duality

(1) Take E to be the graded cogebrà T(M)T(M) (no. 1) and suppose that N, N′N', N′′N'' have the trivial graduation. A graded homomorphism of degree −p-p of T(M)T(M) into N (resp. N′N', N′′N'') then corresponds to a multilinear mapping of MpM^p into N (resp. N′N', N′′N''). Given a multilinear mapping u:Mp→Nu : M^p \to N and a multilinear mapping v:Mq→N′v : M^q \to N', the above method allows us to deduce a multilinear mapping m(u,v):Mp+q→N′′m(u, v) : M^{p+q} \to N'' called the product (relative to mm) of uu and vv. Formulae (3) (no. 1) and (11) show that, for x1,…,xp+qx_1, \ldots, x_{p+q} in M,

(m(u,v))(x1,…,xp+q)=m(u(x1,…,xp),v(xp+1,…,xp+q)). (m(u, v))(x_1, \ldots, x_{p+q}) = m(u(x_1, \ldots, x_p), v(x_{p+1}, \ldots, x_{p+q})).

(2) Take E to be the graded cogebrà S(M)S(M) (no. 1), preserving the same hypotheses on N, N′N', N′′N''. A graded homomorphism of degree −p-p of S(M)S(M) into N then corresponds to a symmetric multilinear mapping of MpM^p into N (§ 6, no. 3). Then we derive from a symmetric multilinear mapping u:Mp→Nu : M^p \to N and a symmetric multilinear mapping v:Mq→N′v : M^q \to N' a symmetric multilinear mapping m(u,v):Mp+q→N′′m(u, v) : M^{p+q} \to N'', also denoted (to avoid confusion) by u.mvu._m v (or even u.vu.v) and called the symmetric product (relative to mm) of uu and vv. Formulae (6) (no. 1) and (11) show that, for x1,…,xp+qx_1, \ldots, x_{p+q} in M,

(u⋅mv)(x1,…,xp+q)=∑σm(u(xσ(1),…,xσ(p)),v(xσ(p+1),…,xσ(p+q)))(u \cdot_m v)(x_1, \ldots, x_{p+q}) = \sum_\sigma m(u(x_{\sigma(1)}, \ldots, x_{\sigma(p)}), v(x_{\sigma(p+1)}, \ldots, x_{\sigma(p+q)}))

the summation being taken over permutations σ∈Sp+q\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{p+q} which are increasing on each of the intervals [1,p][1, p] and [p+1,p+q][p+1, p+q].

(3) Take E to be the graded cogebra ⋀(M)\bigwedge(M) (no. 1). Then we deduce similarly from an alternating multilinear mapping u:Mp→Nu : M^p \to N and an alternating multilinear mapping v:Mq→N′v : M^q \to N' an alternating multilinear mapping m(u,v):Mp+q→N′′m(u, v) : M^{p+q} \to N'', also denoted by u∧mvu \wedge_m v or u∧vu \wedge v and called the alternating product (relative to mm) of uu and vv. Formulae (9) (no. 1) and (11) show in this case that, for x1,…,xp+qx_1, \ldots, x_{p+q} in MM,

(u∧mv)(x1,…,xp+q)=∑σεσm(u(xσ(1),…,xσ(p)),v(xσ(p+1),…,xσ(p+q)))(u \wedge_m v)(x_1, \ldots, x_{p+q}) = \sum_\sigma \varepsilon_\sigma m(u(x_{\sigma(1)}, \ldots, x_{\sigma(p)}), v(x_{\sigma(p+1)}, \ldots, x_{\sigma(p+q)}))

the summation again being taken over permutations σ∈Sp+q\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_{p+q} which are increasing on each of the intervals [1,p][1, p] and [p+1,p+q][p+1, p+q].

We return to the case where E is an arbitrary graded cogebra (of type N) and assume that the three modules N, N', N'' are all equal to the underlying A-module of a graded A-algebra B of type Z\mathbf{Z}, the mapping mm being multiplication in B, so that m~:B⊗AB→B\tilde{m} : B \otimes_A B \to B is a graded A-linear mapping of degree 0. Thus a graded A-algebra structure is obtained on the graded A-module HomgrA(E,B)=C\mathrm{Homgr}_A(E, B) = C.

In particular, suppose that B=AB = A (with the trivial graduation), so that HomgrA(E,A)\mathrm{Homgr}_A(E, A) is the graded dual E∗grE^{*gr}, which thus has a graded A-algebra structure.

Let F be another graded cogebra c′c' its coproduct and ϕ:E→F\phi : E \to F a graded cogebra morphism (no. 1); then the canonical graded morphism

ϕ~=Hom(ϕ,1B):HomgrA(F,B)→HomgrA(E,B)\tilde{\phi} = \mathrm{Hom}(\phi, 1_B) : \mathrm{Homgr}_A(F, B) \to \mathrm{Homgr}_A(E, B)

is a graded algebra homomorphism. For u,vu, v in HomgrA(F,B)\mathrm{Homgr}_A(F, B) and x∈Ex \in E,

(ϕ~(uv))(x)=(uv)(ϕ(x))=m((u⊗v)(c′(ϕ(x)))).(\tilde{\phi}(uv))(x) = (uv)(\phi(x)) = m((u \otimes v)(c'(\phi(x)))).

But by hypothesis c′(ϕ(x))=(ϕ⊗ϕ)(c(x))c'(\phi(x)) = (\phi \otimes \phi)(c(x)), hence

(u⊗v)(c′((x)))=(ϕ~(u)⊗ϕ~(v))(c(x))(u \otimes v)(c'((x))) = (\tilde{\phi}(u) \otimes \tilde{\phi}(v))(c(x))

and therefore ϕ~(uv)=ϕ~(u)ϕ~(v)\tilde{\phi}(uv) = \tilde{\phi}(u)\tilde{\phi}(v), which proves our assertion.

In particular, the graded transpose tϕ:F∗gr→E∗gr^t\phi : F^{*gr} \to E^{*gr} is a graded algebra homomorphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.