Let E be a cogebra over A. In order that, for every associative A-algebra B, the A-algebra HomA(E,B) be associative, it is necessary and sufficient that the coproduct c:E→E⊗AE be such that the diagram
E↓cE⊗AEcc⊗lEE⊗AE↓lE⊗cE⊗AE⊗AE
be commutative.
Let B be an associative A-algebra and u,v,w three elements of C=HomA(E,B). Let m3 denote the A-linear mapping B⊗AB⊗AB→B which maps b⊗b′⊗b′′ to bb′b′′. By definition of the product on the algebra C, (uv)w is the composite mapping
EcE⊗Ec⊗1EE⊗E⊗Eu⊗v⊗wB⊗B⊗Bm3B
whilst u(vw) is the composite mapping
EcE⊗ElE⊗cE⊗E⊗Eu⊗v⊗wB⊗B⊗Bm3B.
It follows that if diagram (12) is commutative, the algebra HomA(E,B) is associative for every associative A-algebra B. To establish the converse, it suffices to show that there exists an associative A-algebra B and three A-linear mappings u,v,w of E into B such that the mapping m3∘(u⊗v⊗w) of E⊗E⊗E into B is injective. Take B to be the A-algebra T(E) and u,v,w the canonical mapping of E into T(E). The mapping m3∘(u⊗v⊗w) is then the canonical mapping E⊗E⊗E=T3(E)→T(E), which is injective.
When the cogebra E satisfies the condition of Proposition 1, it is said to be coassociative.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.