Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0688, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0688].

Algebra, chapter III, § 11. Cogebras, products of multilinear forms, inner products and duality

Let EE be a graded bigebra (resp. skew graded bigebra). For every element xx of degree 1 in EE, the left and right inner products by xx are derivations (resp. antiderivations) (§10§ 10, no. 2) of the algebra E∗grE^{*\mathrm{gr}}.

In the notation of no. 6, for every homogeneous element xx of degree 1 in a graded bigebra (resp. a skew graded bigebra) EE,

c(x)=x⊗1+1⊗x, c(x) = x \otimes 1 + 1 \otimes x,
by Proposition 5 of no. 3 and the fact that cc is a homomorphism of degree 0. Suppose first that EE is a graded bigebra. For all y∈Ey \in E, by definition
⟨(uv)&x,y⟩=⟨uv,xy⟩=m((u⊗v)(c(xy))) \langle (uv) \mathbin{\&} x, y \rangle = \langle uv, xy \rangle = m((u \otimes v)(c(xy)))
and since cc is an algebra homomorphism, c(xy)=c(x)c(y)c(xy) = c(x)c(y). Let c(y)=∑isi⊗tic(y) = \sum_i s_i \otimes t_i with sis_i and tit_i in EE; therefore
c(xy)=∑i(xsi)⊗ti+∑isi⊗(xti). c(xy) = \sum_i (xs_i) \otimes t_i + \sum_i s_i \otimes (xt_i).
Hence ⟨(uv)&x,y⟩=∑iu(xsi)v(ti)+∑iu(si)v(xti)\langle (uv) \mathbin{\&} x, y \rangle = \sum_i u(xs_i)v(t_i) + \sum_i u(s_i)v(xt_i). But we may write
∑iu(xsi)v(ti)=m(((u&x)⊗v)(c(y)))=⟨(u&x)v,y⟩ \sum_i u(xs_i)v(t_i) = m(((u \mathbin{\&} x) \otimes v)(c(y))) = \langle (u \mathbin{\&} x)v, y \rangle
and similarly
∑iu(si)v(xti)=m((u⊗(v&x))(c(y)))=⟨u(v&x),y⟩, \sum_i u(s_i)v(xt_i) = m((u \otimes (v \mathbin{\&} x))(c(y))) = \langle u(v \mathbin{\&} x), y \rangle,
whence, returning to the notation i(x)i(x) for the inner product.
(64)(64)
(i(x))(uv)=((i(x))(u))v+u((i(x))(v))(i(x))(uv) = ((i(x))(u))v + u((i(x))(v))
which proves that i(x)i(x) is a derivation in E∗grE^{*\mathrm{gr}}.

Suppose now that EE is a skew graded bigebra, that u∈Ep∗u \in E_p^*, v∈Eq∗v \in E_q^* and y∈Ery \in E_r; then we can write

c(y)=∑0≤j≤r(∑isij⊗ti,r−j) c(y) = \sum_{0 \leq j \leq r} \left( \sum_i s_{ij} \otimes t_{i,r-j} \right)
where the sijs_{ij} and tijt_{ij} belong to EjE_j; by definition of the product in Eg⊗AEE^g \otimes_A E, then
c(xy)=c(x)c(y)=∑0≤j≤r(∑i(xsij)⊗ti,r−j+(−1)j∑isij⊗(xti,r−j)) c(xy) = c(x)c(y) = \sum_{0 \leq j \leq r} \left( \sum_i (xs_{ij}) \otimes t_{i,r-j} + (-1)^j \sum_i s_{ij} \otimes (xt_{i,r-j}) \right)
whence this time
⟨(uv)&x,y⟩=∑0≤j≤r(∑iu(xsij)v(ti,r−j)+(−1)j∑iu(sij)v(xti,r−j)). \langle (uv) \mathbin{\&} x, y \rangle = \sum_{0 \leq j \leq r} \left( \sum_i u(xs_{ij})v(t_{i,r-j}) + (-1)^j \sum_i u(s_{ij})v(xt_{i,r-j}) \right).

Then also ∑0≤j≤r(∑iu(xsij)v(ti,r−j))=⟨(u⊔x)v,y⟩\sum_{0 \leq j \leq r} \left( \sum_i u(x s_{ij}) v(t_{i,r-j}) \right) = \langle (u \sqcup x)v, y \rangle. On the other hand, u(sij)=0u(s_{ij}) = 0 unless j=−pj = -p and hence we may also write

∑0≤j≤r(−1)j(∑iu(sij)v(xti,r−j))=(−1)p⟨u(v⊔x),y⟩. \sum_{0 \leq j \leq r} (-1)^j \left( \sum_i u(s_{ij}) v(x t_{i,r-j}) \right) = (-1)^p \langle u(v \sqcup x), y \rangle.
We therefore conclude that
(i(x))(uv)=((i(x))(u))v+(−1)pu((i(x))(v)), (i(x))(uv) = ((i(x))(u))v + (-1)^p u((i(x))(v)),
in other words i(x)i(x) is an antiderivation in E∗grE^{*gr}. The assertions relating to the left inner product by an element xx of degree 1 in EE are proved similarly.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.