Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 069H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 069H].

Algebra, chapter III, Appendix 0. Alternative algebras. Octonions

*Let A\mathbf{A} be a ring, F\mathbf{F} a Cayley A\mathbf{A}-algebra, e its unit element, s:x↦x‾s : x \mapsto \overline{x} its conjugation and N:F→A\mathbf{N} : \mathbf{F} \to \mathbf{A} its Cayley norm (§ 3, no. 4).

(i) For F\mathbf{F} to be alternative, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every ordered pair of elements x,yx, y of F\mathbf{F}, x2y=x(xy)x^2y = x(xy).*

(ii) If F is alternative, then N(xy) = N(x)N(y) for all x, y in F. (iii) Suppose that F is alternative. For an element x ∈ F to be invertible, it is necessary and sufficient that N(x) be invertible in Ae; the inverse of x is then unique and equal to N(x)^{-1}\overline{x}; denoting this by x^{-1},

x−1(xy)=x(x−1y)=y x^{-1}(xy) = x(x^{-1}y) = y
or all y ∈ F.

The condition x2y=x(xy)x^2y = x(xy) is obviously necessary for F to be alternative (no. 1, Proposition 1). Conversely, if it holds for every ordered pair of elements of F, applying it to x‾\overline{x} and y‾\overline{y}, it gives x‾2y‾=x‾(xy‾)\overline{x}^2\overline{y} = \overline{x}(\overline{xy}); applying the conjugation s to this relation, we obtain yx2=(yx)xyx^2 = (yx)x, so that conditions (c) of Proposition 1 of no. 1 are satisfied.

Obviously a(e,x,y)=0a(e, x, y) = 0 for all x,yx, y in F. If F is alternative, we therefore deduce from Proposition 1 (no. 1) that the subalgebra G of F generated by e, x and y is associative. As x‾=−x+T(x)∈−x+Ae,x‾∈G\overline{x} = -x + T(x) \in -x + Ae, \overline{x} \in G and similarly y‾∈G\overline{y} \in G. Then N(xy)=(xy)(xy‾)=xy.y‾.x‾=N(y)xx‾=N(y)N(x)N(xy) = (xy)(\overline{xy}) = xy.\overline{y}.\overline{x} = N(y)x\overline{x} = N(y)N(x), using the fact that N(y)∈AeN(y) \in Ae. This proves (ii).

Finally we prove (iii). If N(x)N(x) is invertible in Ae and we write x′=N(x)−1x‾x' = N(x)^{-1}\overline{x}, then xx′=x′x=exx' = x'x = e, for N(x)=xx‾=x‾xN(x) = x\overline{x} = \overline{x}x. Conversely if x admits a left inverse x′′x'', then N(x′′)N(x)=N(e)=eN(x'')N(x) = N(e) = e by (ii) and N(x)N(x) is invertible in Ae; further, as x′=N(x)−1x‾x' = N(x)^{-1}\overline{x} is in the subalgebra generated by x and e, the elements x,x′,x′′x, x', x'' belong to the associative subalgebra generated by x, x′′x'' and e and hence x′′=x′′(xx′)=(x′′x)x′=x′x'' = x''(xx') = (x''x)x' = x', whence the uniqueness assertion. The formulae x−1(xy)=x(x−1y)=yx^{-1}(xy) = x(x^{-1}y) = y follow from the fact that x−1,xx^{-1}, x and y are elements of the subalgebra generated by x, y and e, which is associative.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.