— Let f∈A[X1,...,Xp] and gi∈A[Y1,...,Yq] for 1≤i≤p, and write h=f(g1,...,gp), then for 1≤j≤q we have
∂Yj∂h=i=1∑pDif(g1,...,gp)⋅∂Yj∂gi.
This is the special case E=A[Y1,...,Yr], xi=gi and D=∂/∂Yj of Prop. 4.
Let X=(Xi)i∈I, Y=(Yi)i∈I be two disjoint families of indeterminates, and write X+Y for the family (Xi+Yi)i∈I. Given u∈A[X], consider the element u(X+Y) of A[X,Y]. For ν∈N(I) we denote by Aνu the coefficient of Yν in u(X+Y), considered as polynomial in the Yi with coefficients in A[X]. By definition we have Aνu∈A[X] and
u(X+Y)=ν∑(Δνu)(X)Yν.
(Here and in the rest of this No., the summations are extended over the index set N(I) unless the contrary is said.)
Let a∈A′, then on substituting a for X and X−a for Y in (9) we obtain
u(X)=ν∑(Δνu)(a)(X−a)ν.
In particular we have
u(X)=ν∑(Δνu)(0)Xν.
If u,v∈A[X], we have
(uv)(X+Y)=(ν∑(Δνu)(X)Yν)(ρ∑(Δρv)(X)Yρ)=σ∑[ν+ρ=σ∑(Δνu)(X)(Δρv)(X)]Yσ
hence
Δσ(uv)=ν+ρ=σ∑(Δνu)(Δρv).
Let Z=(Zi)i∈I be another family of indeterminates.
We have:
ν∑(Δνu)(X)(Y+Z)ν=u(X+Y+Z)
=σ∑(Auu)(X+Y)Zu
=ρ,σ∑(ΔρΔσu)(X)YρZσu,
hence by I, p. 99, Cor. 2:
(13)
ΔρΔσu=ρ!σ!(ρ+σ)!Δρ+σu.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.